I very much hope so. I accuse without counter-voice the European research organization CERN of attempting to annihilate the U.S. Namely, by CERN going on with its universe-record symmetric particle collisions on earth for ten years while unable to update its planetary safety report LSAG from early 2008 in view of new safety-relevant information accrued in the scientific literature in the meantime.
The assault on earth is especially vicious because the LSAG carries no date – so the media could not spot the fraud.
There lies an unusual excuse behind this unheard-of attack – blue-eyedness: The fact that the perpetrators did not believe that their crime puts the U.S. at stake along with the rest.
This fact gives the CIA an unheard-of mandate. May I pledge for a public interrogation?
June 15, 2018
P.S.:
The contact form of the cia (https://www.cia.gov/cgi-bin/comment_form.cgi) does not accept the enclosed text, saying: "Error(s) were encountered during the processing of your submission. Please correct the error and resubmit your comments. There must be an entry in the message field for this form to be accepted."
This occurred 5 times around 2:20 pm todate, June 16. So I submit my rejected text from the message field publicly here:
"https://www.researchgate.net/post/Will_the_CIA_interrogate_me
I am a once well-known 78 years old scientist ("chaos researcher") who once worked outside the fence in Los Alamos for a few months in 1983. My late son Jonas was born there.
CERN is a wonderful powerful organization.
But by happenstance I stumbled ten years ago upon a scientific result which radically changes the safety equation of the famous ongoing LHC experiment at CERN.
This result is called "global c" and is a return to the less than 32 years old Einstein.
As one knows, Einstein had a knack for the grandiose. I apologize for the unlikeliness of it all even though there is no scientific counter publication for a decade which is when I first published.
I am confident that the President will be maximally interested in the little story that I am trying to interest you in. Fortunately, the risk to the U.S. and the planet is "only" about ten percent if the return to the early Einstein's global c is correct.
Subjectively I am sure it is correct. And objectively there is no counter publication.
But what really is at stake is not whether I am right or wrong but only whether it is true that CERN cannot (did not) renew its planetary safety report LSAG for ten years, and whether or not CERN is hiding this fact from the public eye by keeping the LSAG undated.
The LSAG is on the web: http://lsag.web.cern.ch/lsag/lsag-report.pdf
I apologize that I turn to you so late.
Take care, everyone,
Sincerely yours,
Otto E. Rossler, an Austrian citizen and a friend of the late Ezer Weizman
It is perhaps important to add that my retrieved result, c-global, is not my own merit but was correctly described in 1929 by Fritz Zwicky in Pasadena.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publication