From the leverage ratio, we know that the amount of borrowing is related to the property of the borrower, and more personal or corporate assets can borrow more money from the bank. So, is this the essence? Is the loan amount really related to the asset ? Is it related to productivity closer to the essence? Whether individual or corporate, the more productive it is, the more money it borrows, isn't that more reasonable? Isn't the better the job the ability, the higher the income,Isn't it even more reasonable?
Leverage is the rate of money flowing. Nobel Prize-winning economist Eric Maskin said, "High leverage is the cause of the financial crisis". Is it true? If a financial crisis occurs because money flows too fast, what should determine that speed? Why is the American currency flowing so fast? Does it have something to do with productivity? I changed the denominator of the leverage formula and replaced it with "productivity"Do you think there is logic? Is it closer to nature than the original leverage calculation?
M/kAL=V
Here, M is the amount of money flowing into or out of companies (or individuals, banks, etc.), A is production efficiency or knowledge, and L is labor. k is the coefficient. V is the new rate of money circulation.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362233496_Analysis_of_Financial_Crisis_Causes_and_Complex_Systems_Scientific_Methods?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6ImhvbWUiLCJwYWdlIjoicHJvZmlsZSIsInByZXZpb3VzUGFnZSI6InF1ZXN0aW9uIiwicG9zaXRpb24iOiJwYWdlQ29udGVudCJ9fQ