For a PbO-SiO2 glass, PbO is a network modifier for up to 30-40%, but it becomes a network former at higher concentration. Why?
Is it related to oxidation state change of Pb, from 2 to 4, and vice-versa? Pb (II) oxide has distorted tetrahedral coordination and Pb(IV) oxide has distorted octahedral coordination.
is the bridge-breaking by low PbO content likened with alkaline earth metal ions? Then what mechanism can be attributed to its bridge formation at higher concentration in Pb-silicate glass, and what is the exact nature of coordination change at this stage?
If the glass in not simple Pb- silicate, but rather Pb- alkali/alkaline earth(aluminosilicate), than what is the compositional role in this "role-change" of PbO?
Pb2+ can act as a network former in oxide glasses when its lone electron pair is sterically active such that the Pb2+ ion forms only 3 to 5 short, strong, bonds to oxygen, typically in the hemisphere opposite that occupied by the lone pair.
By the way, I would not say that there is clear evidence for a strong change in behavior of Pb2+ between modifier and former in pure PbO-SiO2 glasses. Such a transition is much more clear in other systems such as PbO-B2O3.
So no, the modifier-former role of Pb is typically not related to oxidation state changes, rather it is the steric activity of the Pb2+ electron lone pair, or similarly the polarization of the Pb2+.
Adding other elements such as alkali to PbO-SiO2 can have a big impact on the role of Pb, because it can encourage formation of more ionic Pb-O bonding (longer weaker bonds) which cause less polarization, and more of a modifying role for Pb2+. This last part is my personal understanding/conjecture.
Please see:
Thesis The Structure of Vitreous Binary Oxides: Silicate, Germanate...
Article Lone-pair distribution and plumbite network formation in hig...
Article On the germanium–oxygen coordination number in lead germanate glasses