Why don't climatologists and geologists and chemists share the information they get with the general public? How do climatologists respond?

As you know, climatologists and geologists and chemists and even hydrologists and those who work on global meteorology and atmospheric hazards, especially on climate change such as global warming or drought or atmospheric storms or El Lino and La Lino happens in two hemispheres, and people and countries are important, and the opinions of experts are very important; But we see that either it is not published, or the information arrives very late, or it is unclear in the scientific journals, or its classification is not well defined, and in general, there is an irregularity, and at least there is a regular network for public messaging to the world. It does not exist, and the warnings reach the people late, and in my opinion, it requires a global network of news and scientific media of atmospheric hazards, and this cannot be achieved, except for accurate and timely information in the events that are likely to occur. join For example, how many years will there be an earthquake or flood in this area? People are not informed. Or how many years there is drought in this area? . According to the time series, it is clear how many years of drought and how many years of rain? But not informed? . If people experience a drought, they will later find out that there is a drought and they will not be informed at all, or they will not be accurately informed about the gases that destroy the ozone layer. And it seems that all these investigations that are carried out have not been done at all? And man feels sorry.

Miloud Chakit added a reply

Climatologists, geologists, and chemists often do share their findings publicly through scientific publications, conferences, and other channels. However, there are several reasons why the communication of information may not always be immediate or directly accessible to the general public.

Scientific research undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, ensuring accuracy and reliability, which can take time. Additionally, the complexity of scientific findings may require simplification for public understanding, and sometimes the urgency of certain issues might not align with the time-consuming nature of formal scientific communication. Nevertheless, efforts are made to disseminate important information to the public through various means, including media outlets and educational initiatives.

Miloud Chakit added a reply

Climatologists, geologists, and chemists often do share their findings publicly through scientific publications, conferences, and other channels. However, there are several reasons why the communication of information may not always be immediate or directly accessible to the general public.

Scientific research undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, ensuring accuracy and reliability, which can take time. Additionally, the complexity of scientific findings may require simplification for public understanding, and sometimes the urgency of certain issues might not align with the time-consuming nature of formal scientific communication. Nevertheless, efforts are made to disseminate important information to the public through various means, including media outlets and educational initiatives.

Why don't climatologists and geologists and chemists share the information they get with the general public? How do climatologists respond?

Alain Robichaud added a reply

Good question

The communication of information may not always be immediate or directly accessible to the general public for several reasons:

  • Complexity of Information:Some topics, especially scientific or technical subjects, can be complex and require simplification or translation into more understandable terms. If the information is highly technical, it may take time to distill it into a form that is easily digestible by the general public.
  • Specialized Language:Information may be communicated using specialized language or jargon that is not easily understood by those outside a particular field. Translating this language into plain and accessible terms takes effort and time. And scientists are not good communicator.
  • Gatekeeping:Information may go through various gatekeepers, such as media outlets, government agencies, or academic institutions, before reaching the public. These gatekeepers can influence the speed and accuracy of information dissemination. Often, scientist work for institution which might impose some filtering.
  • Verification and Fact-Checking:To ensure accuracy and reliability, information often undergoes verification and fact-checking processes. These processes take time and are crucial to prevent the spread of misinformation.
  • Legal and Ethical Considerations:Some information may be subject to legal or ethical considerations, such as privacy concerns, national security, or proprietary interests. This can lead to delays in public disclosure.
  • Technical Constraints:Technical limitations, such as slow internet speeds or infrastructure issues, can hinder the quick dissemination of information, especially in certain regions.
  • Information Overload:In today's digital age, there is a vast amount of information available, and people may be overwhelmed by the sheer volume of data. Sorting through and prioritizing information takes time.
  • Miscommunication or Confusion:In the process of communication, there may be misinterpretation, miscommunication, or confusion that needs to be clarified before information is widely shared.
  • Bureaucratic Processes:Information from government agencies or large organizations often goes through bureaucratic processes before being released to the public. This can introduce delays.
  • Cultural and Social Factors:Cultural and social factors, including biases and prejudices, may influence how information is disseminated or selectively shared.
  • More Abbas Kashani's questions See All
    Similar questions and discussions