My AFM images for ZnO thin films show different surface roughness at different dopants concentrations. What is the effect of the surface roughness on the optical and electrical properties of ZnO thin films?
Electrical conductivity, carrier concentration and mobility should be measured in the Van der Pauw 4-point probe configuration as a function of surface roughness, in order to study the effects of surface morphology on functional properties.
Optical properties should be characterized in terms of transmittance and haze, i.e. scattered to total transmitted intensity ratio. The results, averaged in the visible range are presented as a function of surface roughness.
Sample Example (Just for Better Understanding):
The obtained surface roughness values ranges from, say 45 nm to 65 nm and should be used as an indicator to analyze the effects of morphology on functional properties. An increase in surface roughness, say was found to increase electrical resistivity due to a decrease in carrier mobility, leaving their concentration substantially unaffected and thus allowing to discuss the limitations in electrical transport due to morphology effects alone.
Optical properties were also influenced by surface roughness, especially in terms of light scattering: the haze factor, say was doubled in correspondence with a 50% increase in surface roughness, whereas the total transmittance was not significantly altered. Understanding these relations between morphology and functional properties can play an important role in optimization of flexible scattering transparent electrodes.