Looking through the history of scientific publications, we can see that only important publications by well-known scientists were getting published and publication was a way to spread special and brilliant findings. But, now we can see that publication has become a way of making money by publishers or it has become a measure for upgrading academic statues. In my opinion, less than 20% of current publications are valuable enough to be considered for being a reference for empirical uses. So, do think that there should be a change in scientific communities to change their viewpoint for future publications?
I have a full agrrement with you Dr. And with no doubt Change is needed . But the real problem in my opinion how to find a criteria that trully evaluate the quality of the reasearch done by the scientists
Dear quality should be emphasized in publishing contributing to the development of the society and mankind.
In my opinion, a researcher must be responsible for what he publishes because science has become a source of profit and not a defect in that, but it is a shame that science becomes a trade only Therefore, new and excellent standards should be developed that allow the development of science and the quality of publications
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publication