The recent essay "Beyond Progress: Unmasking the Myth of Scientific-Economic Advancement" raises a fundamental question: who does science really serve in contemporary society? This debate is an opportunity for us to collectively reflect on whether the current paths of scientific research are aligned with the true interests and needs of humanity.

Discussing the concept of 'Dynamic Genostability' and the interplay between pure and applied science, the essay challenges the prevalence of economic interests in shaping scientific advancements. I invite the community to ponder over these questions:

  • How are economic and corporate interests shaping current scientific research?
  • How can we ensure that science continues to serve human well-being and the advancement of knowledge, rather than merely economic interests?

Your participation and insights are valuable in enriching this crucial debate.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376088736_Beyond_Progress_Unmasking_the_Myth_of_Scientific-Economic_Advancement

More João Carlos Orquiza's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions