If there's another valuable, available and cost effective technic please guide me. many thanks
On what criteria would you like to compare them? Effectiveness implies best results for a comparable price.
This question is hard to answer, probably you mean which technique or kit gives you the highest diagnostic accuracy (at a fair price) for a biomarker.
And what kind of biomarker do you mean? For simple enzymes or substrates even the old chemistry methods combined with photometry on large analyser platforms are very efficient and attractive to use.
You have to start with telling us what biomarker you want to use.
On what criteria would you like to compare them? Effectiveness implies best results for a comparable price.
This question is hard to answer, probably you mean which technique or kit gives you the highest diagnostic accuracy (at a fair price) for a biomarker.
And what kind of biomarker do you mean? For simple enzymes or substrates even the old chemistry methods combined with photometry on large analyser platforms are very efficient and attractive to use.
You have to start with telling us what biomarker you want to use.
I would prefer ELISA assays to get quantitative results on biomarker expression/release.
Dear Seyed
It depends on the nature of molecule's. eg. If the biomarker is protein it is not practice to measure the expression from serum or plasma, using all mentioned techniques. For tissue you can use immunohistochemistry for expression but not for release, using scoring to get quantitative results rather than qualitative.
yes exactly i want to know which one of technics for biomarker assay gives higher accuracy and have more scientific valuablity meanwhile being cost effective than others.
"some of interleukins, Tnf-a, catalase, SOD, GPX, No and some of MS and response to drug (for example glatiramer acetate) biomarkers i meant.
- Badges
- Science method