I could give several examples such as wet waste, sorted municipal solid waste, forest residues, dedicated energy crops, agricultural residues and algae which you can chose from based on a number of factors such as availability, capacity to produce and potential of the specific feedstock.
I believe that the answer to this question depends a lot on the region or country where you are analyzing the use of renewable fuels. The availability of the types of raw materials that can be used efficiently depend largely on their availability in each region or country. That is the main criterion to answer the question: Which are the most promising kinds of feedstock for renewable fuels?
Ideal feedstock will be those which have no enduse, like weeds like Parthenium, water hyacinth etc. Moreover lesser the content of lignin, better is the feedstock for syngas generation. The feedstock should not have secondary usage like, animal feed etc.
Hello Valerio Paolini, in my latest research, I could see that in developing countries with a predominance of tropical climate, the best type of waste to develop new technologies is food waste, these being analyzed throughout their production chain, producer, transport, markets and consumers. Also believe that the biggest challenge is not just the waste or biomass used in the biodigestion process, but the process itself, even though it is a well-discussed subject, many difficulties still remain in its operation.
Lignocellulosic biomass is the most abundant renewable feedstock and is considerably cheaper than crude oil. Also, microalgae are amongst the most promising renewable feedstocks for biofuel production.
It depends on your desired product mean which type of renewable fuels you want. The best one is available easily and will not increase the carbon footprints. Utilising waste for energy production, food waste, forests wastes, agri wastes, etc.
Hamid Salih, I believe that the challenge for the use of lignocellulosic as a raw material is the decomposition of lignin, so that the biodigestion process uses the content of the vegetals cells. And there is the problem of the pretreatment of those vegetables to break the lignin.
For fermentation, the lower the lignin content the better. You may want to keep algae out of it unless you ensure suitable enzymes are present, and you must be ready for some stinking residue and mercaptans in the gas.. Microalgae will give you very ammoniacal solutions at the end.
For gasification, you want your feedstock reasonably dry but it can be just about anything. If you externally heat it, a very high per centage of your energy goes to maintain the temperature. If you use the organic matter to provide the heat, air blown leads to producer gas which is really of fairly low quality. Oxygen blown gives the best quality gas, but you still have to make the oxygen, and there is also the issue of materials to hold the molten alkaline slag.
I rather favour hydrothermal liquefaction because you make liquid fuels, which are more valuable, but you still have to heat the mix. The reaction is exothermic, so if well-judged, this may be minimal, and you can use the gas you make.
There is no single "stand-out" solution. My view is to make that which is easiest to sell at the best value, which may depend on location.
I wonder why this question that has a textbook related answer require so many contributing to saying the same thing in different words. I stay surprised!
There are several kinds of feedstock for renewable fuels. From my point of view, algal biomass is better than cellulosic biomass. But it depends on your aim and goal (bio-oil product, bio-char product or gaseous product) and it depends on the process utilized.