For me, I'd look for inhibition of biofilm formation as well as biofilm biomass reduction through crystal violet assay and also cell viability reduction through BacLight Live Dead staining method. So, basically I utilize two main assays: crystal violet assay and cell viability determination. The reason why I look at these two aspects is due to (1) the ability of some phytochemicals to inhibit bacteria from initiating the formation of biofilm, (2) some phytochemicals are able to directly act on the exopolymeric substance (EPS), thereby reducing the integrity of the whole biofilm thus easily washed away and (3) some phytochemicals can enter the EPS layer and kill the bacteria within the biofilm. What I've found so far are (a) phytochemicals that can inhibit the formation of biofilms but do not kill bacteria that resides within biofilms, (b) phytochemicals that can kill bacteria within biofilms but do not disrupt the biofilm and (c) phytochemicals that can kill bacteria within biofilms as well as disrupt the EPS layer. So what happens in (a) is that crystal violet assay showed positive for antibiofilm but cell viability test showed no significant difference compared to controls. However, in (b), crystal violet assay showed no significant difference compared to controls while the cell viability test revealed significant reduction in bacteria viability. Finally, in (c), both assays showed significant reduction. These are my criteria when I'm screening for antibiofilm activity of phytochemicals. To everyone out there, do you have any thoughts/comments/critics on these ideas? I'd be pleased to know :)

More Delhousie Daniel Jambun's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions