Supervision of undergraduate students continues to be an big problem with most university administration, in particular with supervisors themselves , the student fraternity and the student bodies. Supervisor- students relations tend to stress out due to commonly seen problems such as supervisor appears too busy to be effective in his job, or lacks commitment, is partial to certain students, or not up-to-date with the field, or even poor feedback etc. Therefore my question is directed to what style between "traditional academic or traditional scientific" or "hybrid" of supervision is most ideal ?

More Sudeep Debkuumar's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions