I am comparatively new to Researchgate and today i saw a lot of people taking here about the RG score and concerns surrounding it, This question is a survey in itself to find out about your RG score and what and how important it is for you.
I am comparatively new to Researchgate and everyday i see a lot of people taking here about the RG score and concerns surrounding it, This question is a form of survey in itself to find out about your RG score and what and how important it is for you. Please share your insights researchgate members new and old alike.
You are welcome on RG platform, RG score is simple an evaluation metric used to measure your own academic and scientific productivity in your job as a researcher or scientist, so I advice you to upload all your publications here and please fee free and contact me again and again for more interaction and cooperation.
Dear Emad Kamil Hussein Sir, Thank you much for answering the survey and thank you again for your continuing support and cooperation. I sure will contact you again for further collaborations.
ResearchGate is scientific network to share/collaborate ideas. Especially you can clear your doubts too from experts. You can update your knowledge by interacting.
RG score depends on many factors like your profile and views, your followers, your interaction and recommendations, your research publications their download and citations too.
Hello , Jetty Ramadevi madam, thank you much for replying to the survey and providing useful inputs, looking forward to you participation and co-operation in the future too.
ResearchGate (RG) is a scholarly social network that possesses an impressive array of reputational metrics and has the potential to supplant publishers as the prime deliverer of scholarly reputation. It possesses 10 reputational mechanisms, and these are the subject of an evaluation employing desk research, expert evaluation, and an analysis of 400 RG members. The main conclusions are: RG provides a rich, albeit confusing, amount of reputational data; struggles with the deployment of alternative, engagement metrics, such as Q&A and follower data, which can lead to reputational anomalies; employs usage data in an especially effective manner, and leads the field in the way it engages with the scholar.
Sorry for the Inconvenience caused, I am updating the link again, you can find the full PDF for download via the same. (I have verified the link this time, so please be rest assured)