As we can see that there is much difference between 'gravity well' and 'Flamm's paraboliod' but their out looking shape resembles a similar fashion although it is said that both are distinct in terms of space and space-time. What is true solution and its visualization of space-time for Schwarzschild line element?
Hello Zbigniew,
Thank you for your suggestion. It's not at all what the question seeks. There is mention of Flamm's paraboliod only which is simply slicing of time keeping dt=0, I am searching with dt not=0, a general method.
Hello Zbigniew,
I am in the way to eliminate the singularity problem based on deductive method on Field equations similar to Schwarzschild line element and my work is completed but I want to show the actual difference in between them, in full treatment. The usual way of referring the Schwarzschild metric corresponding to dr^2 only with dt=0 but t=constant is most probably not the correct way to represent the proper space-time. In straight language, the kind of freefall, red shift or time dilation, are not based on dt=0 and hence they are incompatible in accordance to Schwarzschild line element.
That was my idea when I was in BSc. 6yr ago, the time I didn't know about scientific practices. And I have explain well how I came to that idea in paper. It is not out of consideration now, just paused to relate it in advance strategy.
Nope, this is not the case. I will continue it after this work. I want to know why you are so eager on this. Are you working on same or hinted on it?
The actual theme is such light bent could be observe directly from the edge of any surface regardless of whatever magnitude of mass it posses and this relates even to red-shift. I know this directly violet the GR. I don't believe gravitational wave do really exist. And I believe light bent is miscalculation which from the point of postulate in SR, supports it. It is rue that there are highly dense masses effecting rest-mass particle not light. Simply, light is not the factor to be get influence with gravity.
To say it particularly as refraction, it doesn't suit. The reason behind this effect is directly effected by the external factors like optical power of any observing device but entirely independent to the internal property the referenced object. So, what you mentioned is just reversed than what I meant.
At first, QM experiments are based on indirect observations (meaning that conclusions are considered by reflection side) but my way is totally with direct observation which one could experiment within himself (the procedure is well mentioned in paper). Perhaps, it's not QM effect. The relation belongs to pure Optics.
Second, so far the independent of internal property is concerned, it was tested by myself that with less optical power (along with luminous effect taken), the angle of deviation is less and at some point it is null. And even a very tiny object (say thread ) is capable to give such effect in more degree that certainly resembles its independent property. I am not getting your last question please simplify what you meant.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics