Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, and NPV are used to evaluate a diagnostic score or lab. I ask about the test that assess the statistical significance between two diagnostic scores in diagnosis of the same disease
I suggest, convert the two scores to standardized z-scores, use logistic regression to compute OR (95% CI) for predicting major adverse cardiac events by the z-scores of the two test, and look at the AUCs. Attached please find my paper.
Further to my suggestion, if you looking at the agreement between the two scores, you may look at the Bland Altman analysis for agreement, provided the test scores are measured on the same scale. if you are interested in looking at the difference between the two scores, then use paired-value t-test.
my outcome in major adverse cardiac events is yes or no (not percent) therefore, I think that net reclassification tables (NRT) will not help in that situation
I think that odds ratio calculation is logic in that situation
But my question to Dr Muhammad Riaz about applying paired value t test (is it applied on the probability of each value of the two scores that are automatically calculated by binary logistic regression in spss?)
As your outcome is binary and you are assessing the predictive ability of the two type of scores (I don't know what the scores are though), better analysis this is:
convert the two scores to standardized z-scores, use logistic regression to compute OR (95% CI) for predicting major adverse cardiac events by the z-scores of the two test, and look at the Area under the ROC curve and the ORs to decide which of the two scores is better in predicting outcome.