Peer review is no longer of this time. It is slow, expensive, done by biased reviewers that are not omniscient. It cannot handle a revision service. It is a closed session. It conflicts with fast and open accessible e-print archives. It often raises high costs for authors that are not connected to institutions. Personally, I publish on http://vixra.org because it does not require registration and endorsement. I write controversial and unconventional documents that contain new science and will not easily pass a peer review process. I also publish in the form of a Wikiversity project. Like http://arxiv.org, http://vixra.org offers an efficient revision service. Both are free, but http://arxiv.org requires registration, which includes an endorsement. I do not want to bother others with an endorsement request. Instead of the peer review process, I have started a ResearchGate project in which the documents and the Wikiversity project are discussed. The problem with this solution is to get sufficient followers on the ResearchGate project. See: https://www.researchgate.net/project/The-Hilbert-Book-Model-Project
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publisher