02 February 2014 15 1K Report

Dr. James M. Crawford was a linguist who mainly studied Native American languages, including Cocopa, Yuchi, and Mobilian trade language.

In his study on endangered Native American languages (please find attached the journal article), Crawford (1995) argues: "Each language is a unique tool for analyzing and synthesizing the world, incorporating the knowledge and values of a speech community. . . . Thus to lose such a tool is to forget a way of constructing reality, to blot out a perspective evolved over many generations" (33).

I agree with Crawford's viewpoint. In the research paradigms, we all know that the reality (well known as ontology - the nature of being, becoming, existence, or reality) is the basic premise to construct a distinct paradigm.

If the establishment/construction of indigenous research paradigms rely on (or embed in) indigenous languages, what should/can researchers/scholars do for those who are losing their indigenous languages? If those indigenous languages die, does it imply that the establishment or reconstruction of those indigenous research paradigms would become difficult or impossible? Is there any way to resolve this problem or crisis?

Reference

Crawford, James. 1995. "Endangered Native American Languages: What Is to Be Done, and Why?" The Bilingual Research Journal 19 (1): 17-38.

More Che-Wei Lee's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions