I am performing a bibliometric analysis of 2200 papers ranging from the year 1741 to 2020 and I wish to separate the network analyses (of collaboration between authors and between institutions) by a few stages from productivity. So far, I am only familiar with the industrial life cycle analysis approach, but it does not seem so relevant to assess productivity from the publication of scientific articles. In this sense, I would like to ask you: What is the best way to separate by a few stages the scientific productivity (ranges of years for subsequent analyses) in a field of knowledge?
Thank you very much
The empirical object (publications from 1741 to 2020) sounds interesting but I'm afraid I do not understand the question. What do you mean by "productivity of a publication"? What do you mean by "separate by a few stages"? Neither concept is common in bibliometrics.
Jochen Glaser Thank you for your clarification. I am referring to what is the best way to separate a database by year ranges to perform further analysis of collaborative networks (between authors or institutions). The separation by year ranges seeks to show the evolution (from scientific collaboration) of a line of research over time.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Composition Studies
- Publication