I am curious how you view the importance or lack of importance of the Altmetric Score for the dissemination rate of your published article. Is it important or maybe useful or should researchers not even think of such a score?
link https://www.altmetric.com/
Thanks for your feedback,.
Altmetric Score could work as an early indicator of research impact, so it matters to me.
Zahedi, Z., Costas, R. and Wouters, P. (2017), Mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.23883
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23883/abstract
Heidegger got most IF, but his system is missed and wrong, becaouse fair is not the basic emotion, and we have all the emotional colorite, much depends on the prenatal period. A scientist who has some achievement in physics may have less IF, for example he was quoted only in the textbook. However, it is good to know where are you are quoting and whether they are critical or approving.
It is not an academic IF but a measure of how widely it is discussed in public. This may be because it's a very good paper or a very bad one or because of it's relevance to society.
Heavily biased towards English language media. No longer includes LinkedIn nowadays.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Linguistics
- Philology
- Classical Philology
- Manuscripts