Impact Factor (IF) or Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is considered as one of the measures to judge the quality of a journal. As we know that IF value is based on Number of Citation ( https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/essays/impact-factor/?elq=8002fcce746d49ef968516f29d825087 ). Commonly, the journal with a higher value of IF is considered to be of High-Quality Journal. However, it can easily be observed that most of the Review Journals have high-IF as compared to those who publish purely novel works. Additionally, there are some new journals which have started recently have very high-IF values. Normally, highly experienced researchers used to judge the quality of the journals properly (it is my observation).

New researchers are often getting mislead with the value of IFs while judging the quality of a journal (as I think). More confusion arises as there are several other agencies who give (acclaim) IFs values.

Sometimes, we just find the journal in the list of SCI/Scopus listed journals to judge the quality of the journal. Here, we also see that every year, SCI and Scopus update the list by adding/removing some journals. Here, it also cannot guarantee that the selected journal will remain in the list next year.

How should one judge the quality of a journal?

Hope that your quality inputs to this question will help new researchers.

Thanking you in advance for your input.

With regards

More Mahamad Nabab Alam's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions