When we use experimental tests on a low scale, we use quantities such as particle spin, when we come to higher scales, this quantity is no longer an effective quantity and we use a quantity such as electric charge. When we go to a higher scale, we use mass, while two scales Like spin and electric charge, they are no longer effective in the scale of calculating mass scale , like studying the movement of planets. Now, if we go to a higher scale, is it possible that there is a higher quantity that the previous values such as mass, electric charge and spin are not effective in that scale. Isn't that quantuty of dark matter? Or is its field and energy not what we know as dark matter?
This is not
Understandable.
Dark matter emits no light
Thats all
But there are different ideas why this is
or could appear to be so
The answer to the first question is that dark matter is a new form of matter, whose only hitherto known interactions with known matter are gravitational. Its particle content is the subject of research for quite some time.
The answer to the second question is, No.
Regarding the statements made in the text, pertaining to scales, these are wrong.
A relativistic particle is characterized by its mass and its spin on the one hand and by its charges under ``internal symmetries'' on the other hand.
So the particles that make up ordinary matter have known mass and spin and carry charges under the weak, electromagnetic and strong interactions; the particles that make up dark matter may have mass and spin, which aren't, yet, known; what is known is that they don't carry charge under the electromagnetic and strong interactions-they may carry charge under the weak interactions. They can carry charges under new interactions, that remain to be discovered.
According to my theory Preprint Cyclic-time mechanics of isolated systems
matter spins in both time and space. The electron, having no radius, spins only in time (Zitterbewegung) and that's why its spin is +/- 1/2. Electron revolving about the nucleus inside the atom, gets partial delocalization because of the increased time in the bigger system which means an excess of kinetic energy. On the contrary, the protons have concentrated mass which is an excess of potential energy. These excesses create negative and positive charges, respectively. Light does not have spin and that's why it is a fully delocalized energy. We can think of light as electrons that have lost their spin (angular momentum) and left the matter completely. For systems that have radius, the full spinor (time+space) localizes the energy in one spinning whirlpool and that's why we have mass (=localized energy). No need for dark matter.- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Science
- Media
- Journalism