If I've understood it correctly, a recent paper by Aaron Winder
and colleagues (Article Weak correlations between hemodynamic signals and ongoing ne...
) shows that in mice altered cerebral blood volume in Resting State is poorly correlated with neural activity, and is more likely to refelct some neurovascular activity.If the findings get replicated, they might contradict the widespread belief that resting state networks might indicate some psychological process (although a yet-to-be-identitied one).
Wouldn't that downplay all the 'hype' with Resting State Network, at least as far as they're taken to reveal some 'essential function' of the brain? Which implications might there be from such a reframing?