Am in principal support Tesfaye Barza of the given insights:
Restricting access to scientific knowledge bottlenecks urgently needed innovation and global economic growth. It’s comparable to throttling internet speed or reducing global penetration.
Transparent and open science builds trust in science. A lack of public trust in science can hinder the development of life-saving vaccines, medicines, solutions for a greener world and limit economic growth.
I don't know if it is possible to reduce the penetration of globalization in different countries, due to the economic interdependence that exists at a global level: merchandise, production chains, financial markets, technological dependence, just to mention a few areas.
Global penetration has been rising in many sectors by many countries. At the same time we observe few selected countries adopting protectionism in trade due to national security and other socio- economic reasons. Tariffs and non- tariff measures are the major to reduce such penetration in many sectors. There are many valid causes countries have been raising and creating interventions
In personal opinion, Globalization is primarily an economic process that has no reverse. However, there is the case of Eastern European countries with an economic model (centrally planned economies) commonly called socialist, which reverted to the capitalist system at the end of 1989.