The question goes to researchers in sciences and social sciences including science education.
Tips -- order of realizing these points in a review is important:
1. Novelty of the reviewed educational approach or tool.
1.1. Technological novelty (e.g. stereoscopic 3D simulation environment, mobility educational application).
1.2. Pedagogical novelty – for example new teaching paradigms implemented.
2. Comparison with previous work on the subject.
3. Benefits for students
3.1. New learning insights
3.2. Availability for certain student groups according to geographical location, price to access, accessibility options, etc.
4. How the reviewed idea may be further developed to benefit other branches of teaching, tutoring subjects, or target groups.
5. Statistical review with samples extracted from test populations. Review of how students answered questions in questionnaires, quizzes, spontaneous or requested students’ feedback.
For a systematic review, you can download and analyse a representative set of papers focused on your topic. Include science metrics, assess altmetrics, number of citations for each one. Perform statistical analysis based on your data. Visualize it in table and or graph/diagrams view. Analyse results and write conclusions. Use as much various data and papers as possible.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Science