I am novice at commercial FE packages, but I would like to try them. However I am not sure which one to choose. Your expert feedbacks are very much appreciated.
The Abaqus is better at implicit time integration while the Ls-Dyna better at explicit time integration (inertia effect taken into account). So the time step for the Abaqus is usually much larger than the one used by the Ls-Dyna, but for strong non-linear problems, such as contact/impact, the former would probably encounter convergence problem while the latter is doing better. One advantage of the Ls-Dyna is that it is embedded with heaps of material models. As far as your publications I have read, I think the Abaqus is probably more suitable for your research.
The Abaqus is better at implicit time integration while the Ls-Dyna better at explicit time integration (inertia effect taken into account). So the time step for the Abaqus is usually much larger than the one used by the Ls-Dyna, but for strong non-linear problems, such as contact/impact, the former would probably encounter convergence problem while the latter is doing better. One advantage of the Ls-Dyna is that it is embedded with heaps of material models. As far as your publications I have read, I think the Abaqus is probably more suitable for your research.
There should be no problem for the Abaqus to do parametric studies as long as modelling is guaranteed to be convergent (here I mean sufficiently small time steps to keep modelling convergence).