I think this is one of the most critical questions that calls for a better understanding of some of the key issues and options that guide the success of academic or a scholarly publication in a peer reviewed journal. I am aware there are personal reasons which can be attributed to the efforts of the writers or the editors of publications. The former, may be called external factors and the latter are the internal factors.

Let me begin with the internal reasons for a journal article submission. I am able to identify the following main reasons. First, failure to follow or comply with the given guidelines which an author of a journal article or manuscript is a advised to follow by the editor. Every journal has got an in house style or guideline which must be followed by all intending or potential authors Guidelines act as a marking scheme for compliance by the author.

Second, plagiarism, or copying directly without acknowledging the original source. This is unethical, any when an editor detects plagiarism from any submission, s/he is bound to reject the article. This is important for both legal and ethical reasons and for the integrity of the editor or the publishing house.

Third, decisions by the peer reviewers to the editor and to the article writer based on the quality of the work that has been submitted.

Fourth, is connected to the above reason. This has to do with submission of poor quality work or carelessly written work in a manner that shows lack personal interest of author himself or herself.

Firth, lack of basic knowledge in the subject area. This is to do with an author who submits work with content that indicates lack of basic or professional understanding of the subject matter of the article that has been submitted.

Sixth, failure to comply with a specific deadlines for some issues of the publication after the editor or the publishing house emphasized the need to meet a specific submission deadline.

Seventh, violations of basic academic writing rules, For example, submitting an article that leaves out key or important components of an article such missing objectives, methodology, conclusions, abstracts, references, or results, among others.

Ninth, refusing to comply with the suggested corrections to be made on the article as provided by the editor or the peer reviewers who had commented on the submissions.

These are some of the reasons for rejecting submissions.

Best regards

Wilson

I think this is one of the most critical questions that calls for a better understanding of some of the key issues and options that guide the success of academic or a scholarly publication in a peer reviewed journal. I am aware there are personal reasons which can be attributed to the efforts of the writers or the editors of publications. The former, may be called external factors and the latter are the internal factors.

Let me begin with the internal reasons for a journal article submission. I am able to identify the following main reasons. First, failure to follow or comply with the given guidelines which an author of a journal article or manuscript is a advised to follow by the editor. Every journal has got an in house style or guideline which must be followed by all intending or potential authors Guidelines act as a marking scheme for compliance by the author.

Second, plagiarism, or copying directly without acknowledging the original source. This is unethical, any when an editor detects plagiarism from any submission, s/he is bound to reject the article. This is important for both legal and ethical reasons and for the integrity of the editor or the publishing house.

Third, decisions by the peer reviewers to the editor and to the article writer based on the quality of the work that has been submitted.

Fourth, is connected to the above reason. This has to do with submission of poor quality work or carelessly written work in a manner that shows lack personal interest of author himself or herself.

Firth, lack of basic knowledge in the subject area. This is to do with an author who submits work with content that indicates lack of basic or professional understanding of the subject matter of the article that has been submitted.

Sixth, failure to comply with a specific deadlines for some issues of the publication after the editor or the publishing house emphasized the need to meet a specific submission deadline.

Seventh, violations of basic academic writing rules, For example, submitting an article that leaves out key or important components of an article such missing objectives, methodology, conclusions, abstracts, references, or results, among others.

Ninth, refusing to comply with the suggested corrections to be made on the article as provided by the editor or the peer reviewers who had commented on the submissions.

These are some of the reasons for rejecting submissions.

Best regards

Wilson

Thanks a lot Wilson Truman Okaka for your valuable discussion. Best Regards

The reason may be due to the weakness of the language of writing or the requirement of the journal to add citation research from the same magazine. Or the requirement that the author of research is from the world advanced universities.

You are right Dr. Ahmed.

I appreciate your contribution Ahmed Saeed Mohmed . Regards

Thank you for sharing your opinion Ademilade Aboginije .

It is possible that the subject of the research is in a specialization other than that of the magazine or a previously mentioned subject

You are right Dr Zainab Mahmood Jawad . Many thanks

I appreciate your contribution Asia Mahdi Naser . Regards

The reason may be due to the weakness of the language of writing the artical or the journal topics area are not interested in the field of your paper. Also, manuscript does not indicate any new contribution with grammatical mistakes. Finally, the abstract of the mansucript does not clearly with no a problem statement.

Regards

Very important points Assad H. Thary Al-Ghrairi . Thank you for your contribution.