@ Amira, actually conventional agriculture do not give enough time for the soil to replenish its nutrients and causes increased greenhouse gas emissions, soil erosion, water pollution, and threatens human health. On the other hand sustainable agriculture lands are rich with much more nutrients, as they get the necessary time to replenish their nutrients but it has higher operation cost.

Intensive agriculture practices do not give enough time for the soil to replenish its nutrients. Sustainable farmlands are rich with much more nutrients, as they get the necessary time to replenish their nutrients. Intensive agriculture practices do not give enough time for the soil to replenish its nutrients. Sustainable farmlands are rich with much more nutrients, as they get the necessary time to replenish their nutrients. Conventional agriculture was characterized by efficiency; uniformity, and maximization, sustainable agriculture could be described by diversity, interconnectedness, and preservation. Sustainable farming is based on the diversity of plants and animals kept on the farm. Conventional farming has been heavily criticized for causing biodiversity loss, soil erosion, and increased water pollution due to the rampant usage of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides.

Amira Attia El-Mehy

Conventional agriculture and sustainable agriculture differ in their approaches to farming and the impact they have on the environment, economy, and society. Here are some of the cons of conventional agriculture compared to sustainable agriculture:

Cons of conventional agriculture:

Cons of sustainable agriculture:

Overall, sustainable agriculture has fewer negative impacts on the environment, human health, and the economy compared to conventional agriculture. However, it requires a shift in farming practices and may present challenges for farmers in the short term.

Conventional agriculture and sustainable agriculture represent two different approaches to farming, each with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. Here are some of the cons associated with conventional agriculture compared to sustainable agriculture:

Conventional agriculture often relies heavily on synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides, which can lead to soil degradation, water pollution, and harm to non-target organisms. Intensive tillage and monocropping practices in conventional agriculture can lead to increased soil erosion, loss of topsoil, and decreased soil fertility over time. Monoculture practices and extensive use of pesticides in conventional agriculture can lead to a reduction in biodiversity, as they create an environment less conducive to supporting diverse plant and animal species. Conventional agriculture may involve excessive water use, leading to aquifer depletion and reduced water availability for other uses. Runoff from chemical applications can also contaminate water bodies. Conventional agriculture relies heavily on fossil fuels for machinery, transportation, and the production of synthetic inputs, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Conventional agriculture often prioritizes short-term gains in productivity and profit over long-term environmental sustainability. The costs associated with purchasing synthetic inputs such as fertilizers and pesticides can be significant, leading to financial strain for some farmers. It's important to note that sustainable agriculture aims to address many of the drawbacks associated with conventional agriculture. While there are challenges to adopting sustainable practices, they are designed to promote long-term environmental health, community well-being, and economic resilience in the face of changing agricultural and environmental conditions.