I think there is no 'best' method. There are several different approaches that can answer different questions. Both 'spatial analysis' and 'road accidents' are very broad topics, and the method to be selected depends not only on the research question but on the type, quality and resolution of your data, and also on the presence of auxiliary variables.
I think there is no 'best' method. There are several different approaches that can answer different questions. Both 'spatial analysis' and 'road accidents' are very broad topics, and the method to be selected depends not only on the research question but on the type, quality and resolution of your data, and also on the presence of auxiliary variables.
Qayssar Ajaj Terrain, location, type of road, curves, bends, speed limits, etc are some of the factors that lead to the cause of accidents. You can carry out all these analyses on the road network spatial data available using any GIS software Viz. Arc GIS; open-source - Q GIS, etc., so that you can pinpoint the accident-prone points.
GIS was used as a management system for accident analysis by applying combination of spatial-statistical methods.
The operational approach of spatial patterns was developed in geographical information system (GIS) framework to analyze three types of urban accidents (fatal, injury and property damage only (PDO)).
The following conclusions can be drawn for the total number of accidents:
For the number of accidents per unit of time, there is a clear and strong time dependence. The number of accidents is higher in April-may, and less in the winter months. The peak of accidents every day falls on the evening hours, when people return from work. The largest number of accidents occurs at the end of the working week, the smallest-at the weekend.
The accident rate is strongly influenced by systematic factors such as weather conditions, the presence of structures, and the condition of the pavement. Lighting (operation of lighting devices) also affects, and the included headlights reduce accidents even in the twilight/light time.
The most frequently recorded are pedestrian collisions and minor collisions with 1-2 victims. Collisions mostly occur at intersections, and collisions occur at pedestrian crossings.
Accidents on major highways occur less frequently than on medium-sized roads, but are characterized by a large number of victims.
As for the number of victims of accidents, the following conclusions can be drawn:
There are clear and strong time factors depending on the number of victims from the characteristics of the accident, and periods characterized by a decline in accidents have a high average number of victims.
The largest number of victims is characterized by accidents with a large number of participants (people). But a small number of cars.
The number of victims is almost not subject to systematic factors, such as the state of the road or the weather.
When building a model of the dependence of the number of victims on the accident parameters, the most significant factors are the type of incident and time parameters.
Accidents on small roads are characterized by a small number of victims, while on large motorways the number of victims is increasing.
Agree with all of the above. Would need an idea of the dataset and research question(s). Is it site specific or a large dataset of collision hotspots? (Related side note - even though it hasn't been completely adopted in the academic vernacular, safety advocates push for using the language of "crashes" or "collisions", rather than "accidents". The latter term implying that vehicle collisions are just oopsy-type collateral damage of automobility, rather than preventable tragedies (for e.g. see: The Automobile Imperative).