If you make research you can use bench type DM's like Agilent (older HP), Fluke or GW. But if you intend to measure a quantity like frequency or voltage from Power table you can use mobile devices like GW, Lutron, Brymen, Fluke.

I have used Alan Rowe's Decision Styles Inventory in several studies. One study of > 400 organizational leaders from U.S., Japan and China uncovered distinctive national styles of decision making (Martinsons, 2001, Academy of Management Proceedings). Hope this helps.

Hi Besnik,

I recommend this article:

Vigoda-Gadot, E. and Meiri, S. “New public management values and person-organization fit: a socio-psychological approach and empirical examination among public sector personnel”, Public Administration, Vol. 86(1), 2008, pp. 111-131

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227517046_New_public_management_values_and_Person-Organization_Fit_A_socio-psychological_approach_and_empirical_examination_among_public_sector_personnel

Much depends on the nature of the decision, in light of which actors can engage in different types of thinking. "Everyday" decision-making requires little competence and can be accomplished in "default" mode: in such cases, people have a strong tendency to stick with the tried and tested (or trusted). More complex decision-making—to be defined, of course, but recognizing that everything is relative—may call for more analysis and deliberation and even a good deal of mental effort; supposing there is an optimal strategy, which is not necessarily the case, this is where bounded rationality, cognitive bias, personality, and free will come in (and tools for debiasing are relevant). Most importantly, the process of decision-making is impacted by the number of people associated with it; these days, complex decision-making tasks demands teamwork (and can fall prey to the vagaries of that). Not to forget, since this query relates to the public sector, hierarchy does weigh in and not every decision maker is equal. Article On Decision Making