Dear Yousif Yaqoob Shahtha ,

There are three main theories of leadership and management today. They are transformational leadership, agile leadership and servant leadership. Depending on the organizational structure, goals and challenges the proper style would vary in effectiveness.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/modern-leadership-theories-mark-ligot-m-i-t-/

Regards,

Shafagat

Modern leadership theories have evolved over time to reflect the changing dynamics of organizations and the complexities of leadership in the 21st century. Here are some of the prominent modern leadership theories and concepts:

Transformational Leadership: This theory emphasizes the leader's ability to inspire and motivate followers to achieve their full potential and exceed their own expectations. Transformational leaders often lead by example and create a compelling vision for the future.

Transactional Leadership: Transactional leaders focus on the exchange of rewards and punishments to motivate and manage their followers. They set clear expectations, provide rewards for good performance, and apply corrective actions when necessary.

Servant Leadership: This theory proposes that effective leaders serve their followers' needs and prioritize their well-being. Servant leaders are known for their empathy, humility, and a focus on the growth and development of their team members.

Authentic Leadership: Authentic leaders are genuine and true to themselves. They are transparent, honest, and consistent in their actions and decisions. Authenticity is seen as a key component of effective leadership in this model.

Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory: LMX theory suggests that leaders form unique relationships with each of their followers. In-group members have a higher quality relationship with the leader and, as a result, receive more trust, responsibility, and support.

Situational Leadership: Situational leadership posits that leadership effectiveness depends on adapting one's leadership style to the specific needs of a given situation or follower. Leaders must assess the situation and the readiness of their followers to determine the most suitable approach.

Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory: LMX theory suggests that leaders form unique relationships with each of their followers. In-group members have a higher quality relationship with the leader and, as a result, receive more trust, responsibility, and support.

Adaptive Leadership: Adaptive leaders focus on solving complex, adaptive challenges. They encourage flexibility, learning, and innovation to address evolving issues in an organization.

Authentic Leadership: Authentic leaders are genuine and true to themselves. They are transparent, honest, and consistent in their actions and decisions. Authenticity is seen as a key component of effective leadership in this model.

Ethical Leadership: Ethical leaders prioritize moral values and principles in their decision-making. They set a positive example for their followers, and their actions align with ethical and social responsibilities.

Charismatic Leadership: Charismatic leaders possess an exceptional ability to inspire and influence followers through their personality, vision, and communication skills. They often create a strong emotional connection with their teams.

Distributed Leadership: Distributed leadership acknowledges that leadership is not the sole responsibility of one individual. Instead, it's a shared and distributed function throughout the organization, with various team members taking leadership roles when needed.

Cultural Intelligence (CQ) Leadership: This theory focuses on leaders' ability to work effectively in diverse cultural settings. Leaders with high cultural intelligence can adapt and thrive in multicultural environments.

Neuroleadership: Drawing from neuroscience, this theory explores how an understanding of brain processes can inform leadership practices, including decision-making, communication, and employee motivation.

These modern leadership theories reflect the growing recognition that effective leadership is not one-size-fits-all but depends on the context, the organization, and the unique qualities of both leaders and followers. Leaders often employ a combination of these theories and adapt their approaches to suit different situations and challenges.

I think the topic is crucial in this dynamic world. In this regard, in the previous discussion they pointed out much though it becomes still a debating issue in identifying the best theories as theories make a milestone to explore empirical findings. As stated in most scholars there is a pros and cons in applicability of leadership theories, sometimes the Great man theory may be applicable but at other time more of transformational leadership more valuable in this time as it almost incorporates most of leadership theories and styles which identified by numerous researchers. Try to read my article published in this link if it may be useful to you? Topic of a research:

A REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP CHALLENGES IN THE 21ST CENTURY

By: Belay Girma *

Available at globets.org/journal (IJETS)

International Journal of Education, Technology and Science

2(4) (2022) 486–501.

Modern Leadership Theories are:

1) Transformational Leadership

2) Agile Leadership

3) Servant Leadership

Yousif Yaqoob Shahtha although it's not a "new" theory, for educational purposes, I believe you can find great insights and eventually a solid ground on Ignatian Leadership. This theory has been evolved a lot since the XVI centrury when Saint Ignatius began to apply it. Here to help in whatever you need.

As listed by Dr Baqer Al-hadrawi

The best manager we ever had led by Transformational Leadership, I'm sure, although I had not these terms before. She was the beat manager I had ever had and was so sad when she decided to go back to being a health visitor. She had been a nursing manager when she managed us.

Throughout history, leadership has always been linked to a person.

Previous theories focused on attributes/traits. Then situation and contexts.

More modern theories looked into relationships (charismatic, transformational, servant etc).

But the most recent are forms of "shared" leadership.

Distributed Leadership and "web of inclusion" are examples.

My own work considers whether a "person" leader could be replaced by a clear goal and culture: a leader-less leadership model.

Constellation leadership is available here: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23440.79368