Hello scientific community on Research Gate,

It has been a rough week as I have been troubleshooting to resolve mediocre paraffin sections.

Initially, I thought it was due to improper fixation (inadequate 10% NBF recipe) of my specimen. Then, I was made aware that absolute EtOH is not available in our lab and we were using 96.6% EtOH as a substitute. Therefore, it was sensible to assume that incomplete tissue dehydration could account for the observed artifacts on the paraffin ribbon. I managed to find some 99.9% EtOH and repeated the procedure, but to no avail.

It seems that the microtome blade, that I replaced, is cutting rather around (and not through) the tissue which leaves a perforation on the ribbon corresponding to my embedded specimen. On better instances, I would manage to obtain a (semblance of) section of my specimen with noticeable lacerations and tears.

My hunch is that the paraffin has deteriorated (expired since 2008) and is poorly impregnating the specimen.

As per your anecdata, what is causing this horrendous (at best) paraffin section?

Is this artifact most likely attributed to processing (i.e., fixation, dehydration, clearing, infiltration) or defective material?

To guide your diagnostic input, here's an approximate description of the protocol:

Fixation

10% NBF - 48h

Dehydration

60% EtOH - 1hr

70% EtOH - 1hr

80% EtOH - 1hr

90% EtOH - 1hr

100% EtOH - 1hr

(All of which are calculated/prepared from a 96.6% EtOH bottle deemed as 100%)

Do you think I am being overzealous to procure 100% ethanol or the available 96.6%EtOH would suffice for dehydration?

Clearing

Xylene - 1hr

Wax infiltration

In paraffin (Overnight, oven @70°C).

P.S. I have included snapshots (1, 2, 3 — from bad to worst) of the modest chef-d'oeuvres that I've produced for the past 2 weeks and it's borderline frustrating.

Your compassion and expertise are greatly appreciated.

Thank you!

More Sami al Harake's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions