How to address the reviewer's comment that the validation of the dynamic assessment tool is weak which needs to be reworked significantly? Any reliable references confirming the validity of this technique?
I need more information about the dynamic assessment tool you are referring to. Could you please provide more details about the tool and the context in which it is being used? This will help me provide an answer.
Chuck A Arize I am applying dynamic factor analysis to develop a dynamic index for smart cities. however, the reviewer thinks it is a weak tool in that context. thank you
Validation is a quality review process that confirms an assessment system can consistently produce valid assessment judgements. A valid assessment judgement is one that confirms a learner holds all of the knowledge and skills described in a training product. Validation activities are generally conducted after assessment is complete—so that an organization can consider the validity of both assessment practices and judgements. Validation involves checking that your assessment tools have produced valid, reliable, sufficient, current and authentic evidence—evidence that allows your organization to make reasonable judgements about whether training product requirements have been met.