The calculation results of the first and second laws of thermodynamics are different.
The calculation method of the second law of thermodynamics involves data piecing together, resulting in a compromise between theory and experiment. It is believed to cause differences between the two, and this method is widely adopted.
If the second law of thermodynamics does not use the piecing together method, its deviation from the experiment will be exposed. This patchwork method is meant to conceal this deviation. It is a shameful behavior.
Science speaks in mathematics, and to prove the correctness of the second law of thermodynamics, quantitative predictions must be made and consistent with experiments.
The second law is actually a theorem, rigorously derived from the theory of probability. Unless you claim (and prove) that the theory of probability is wrong, you are gonna have a real hard time to prove that the 2nd law is wrong.
The conclusion of the second law of thermodynamics is that the Carnot efficiency of hydrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide, water vapor, liquid water, solid water... is 1-T2/T1. Do you believe it?
The use of statistical mechanics to calculate thermodynamics E and P is not yet mature, and the current experiments do not conform to the second law of thermodynamics. We need to piece together the data. Using statistical probability to talk about things is just deceiving oneself.