Hi Sybney,

If it is so easy to answer with a current text book explanation why are there puzzles that can not be answered with current understanding? If you can provide a link with an explanation I would appreciate it. Best to you:)

RG: .. moving from a closed system of E=Mc2 where c is the velocity of light to an open system where c is the acceleration of light ..

The units would not be correct if you did that, there would be an extra factor of T-2. Try a dimensional analysis to see this.

Thanks George. I am sorry to put you out but can you send me a link to a more detailed understanding. I would really love to get this out of my mind once and for all. What I am trying to say is that after one plank second there is a linear transformation from one vector space to a new one. There is no limit to the new number of vector spaces. The origin vector space is not altered. We just have a multi dimensional array of them. We can only measure from within our own vector space.

dear Rick, < moving from a closed system of E=Mc2 where c is the velocity of light to an open system >... closed systems do not exist (in cosmos).

Thanks so much for all your responses!. I really enjoy learning from you. It seems like the Standard Model is a closed system. You have a defined limit on the growth that seems to not be supported by some anomalies. If there was an array of overlapping Big Bangs the quasar's mass puzzle could possibly be from a separate big bang. And the dark matter we can not find is from one of them. Always brings me back to the story of the sphere intersecting a two dimensional world and the only way they can describe it is as a dot growing to a circle then becoming a dot.

in my opinion the so-called universe is not a closed system (in cosmos) as assumed. so: the entire big bang theory has to be revised

Hi All

Using Planck's constant seems to nail everything from the accretion disks down to the quanta. But from my understanding it doesn't hold up within a black hole or with quantum entanglement. I believe in both cases we have faster than light experiences. Black holes could be creating the extreme mass effects by having their mass accelerate faster than the speed of light. The more you accelerate mass the greater the mass becomes. Black holes are created from mass moving faster than light. The mass being drawn into a black hole is accelerated toward the accretion disk up to the speed of light. Once within it the accretion disk the mass is moving faster than the speed of light which creates the extraordinary level of mass required to create the gravitation force that black holes posses. Can I get your input?

Dear Rick,

Scientists observe supermassive black hole in infant universe

Findings present a puzzle as to how such a huge object could have grown so quickly.

The reason is very simple: there is no Big Bang! The universe is rather static.

An interesting indication of this is given by the observation of the Karlsson peaks.

When we look at the distribution of quasar peaks, of which the light reaches us, there a 5 groups of almost identical peaks, all with exactly the same distance from each-other, measured with their respective redshifts.

That means that the light is circling about our part of a quite static universe, over 5 times until now.

Research The Karlsson Peaks in the Quasar's Redshift Distribution as ...

Dear Rick,

You wrote: "Black holes could be creating the extreme mass effects by having their mass accelerate faster than the speed of light. The more you accelerate mass the greater the mass becomes. Black holes are created from mass moving faster than light. The mass being drawn into a black hole is accelerated toward the accretion disk up to the speed of light. Once within it the accretion disk the mass is moving faster than the speed of light which creates the extraordinary level of mass required to create the gravitation force that black holes posses."

Faster than light is not required. It is the retardation of the gravity fields by the speed of light that is accumulating in a certain way, making an apparent mass increase.

This occurs with fast spinning stars. When a star with a mass of a few times the mass of our Sun will collapse, its spin will increase dramatically. However, due to the effect of the retardation of the fields by the speed of light, the gravitational angular momentum may increase in a multiple factor of the (constant remaining) mechanical angular momentum. Some see this as a mass increase due to special relativity, but that is not correct.

The Gravity Probe B experiment has proven that there exists a second gravity field that induces moving masses by a force that is comparable to the Lorentz force in electromagnetism.

It is that force that causes the fast spinning star to not explode, because it gives a self-induction that is a compression force between the latitudes -35° and 35°.

That is why some supernovae such as SN1987A or Carinae Eta have a special shape, with a double lobe. (The apparent explosion at the equator is in fact the collision between the bent mass from one hemisphere towards the other, and not a separate explosion).

Another important point is that it is very unlikely that there is one huge black hole in the center of a galaxy. Most probably, there are many small black holes.

The reason is double: 1) when large nebulae condensate by gravity, there are no huge stars appearing but a number of smaller stars. These stars can collapse and become fast spinning stars and smaller black holes.

2) Black holes don't absorb the surroundings, like matter of the acretion discs. They just accelerate very strongly the matter to the north and south pole if the accretion disc contains matter that approaches the black hole.

Research On the geometry of rotary stars and black holes

Research How Really Massive are the Super-Massive Rotating Black Hole...

Very enlightening @Thierry De Mess. Thank you Sir!!!

@Sydney Thank You Sir!!!:)

more: in my work (published here on RG) I have demonstrated that natural constants are not constant indeed: they all depend on time.

theory says: once the whole universe was nothing but one single singularity at big bang- now there are more. Man, how time changes!

(it`s about homogeneity :))