Sun’s Energy Budget: Has any relevance with Earth’s Climate?

1.   How do we exactly know, whether, 4 million tons of mass gets converted

into energy each second, by considering, 600 million tons of H every second

gets converted into 596 million tons of He?

Is it just based on the atomic mass of He (3.97 times that of Hydrogen) and

Hydrogen?

2.   Whether free nuclei and electrons has no role to play with - in the

Proton-Proton chain of Sun – in the context of - the marginal amount of the

proton’s mass getting translated into energy as per E = mc^2?

3.   In the absence of any interaction with other matters,

how exactly neutrinos

(made by hydrogen fusion in core; where, 10^38 neutrionos per second are

released from Sun; and, which travels at speed, close to that of light)

released from the Sun does not necessarily cause cellular damage,

while a fraction of neutrions (10^15 neutrionos flowing through us each

second) keep simply flowing through our bodies?

4.   How long Sun is expected to be in equilibrium,

where pull of gravity is assumed to match exactly

with the push of (fusion) thermal pressure?

5.   What happens, when nuclear fusion rate

occurring at the core

gets slowed down

with time

(before core gets collapsed by gravity)?

6.   Whether nuclear fusion rate (solar thermostat)

has anything to do with

the mean surface temperature of earth?

7.   To what extent, the mean surface temperature of earth

would get influenced,

when the hydrogen content of the core

gets reduced with time

(only with Helium @ the center)?

8.   How does mean surface temperature of earth would get influenced –

upon increased Sun’s luminosity – resulting from enhanced energy creation –

associated with the accelerated burning of hydrogen shell,

as the core starts collapsing?

9.   Theoretically, upon reaching next 4 – 5 billion years,

whether, carbon core itself will get collapsed,

following the burning of Hydrogen and Helium shells

(proto-star; main-sequence star; red giant; planetary nebula; white dwarf)?

Or

Should we happy with concept of dark energy,

where a uniform source of repulsive gravity

keeps expanding the universe?

More Suresh Kumar Govindarajan's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions