Body size (total length or body mass) estimates, derived from linear measurements of skeletal elements (e. g. skull length, molar length, long bone diameter), are commonly used for paleobiological studies.

There is a trend to use Reduced Major Axis (RMA), instead of Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), due to the asumption of error distributed betweeen both the independent and dependent variable in RMA, instead of being considered only for the dependent variable as in OLS. However, some authors (e.g. Kilmen & Rodriguez, 2017) consider RMA has additional problems, and OLS can be used for allometry studies if the error of the independent variable can be ensured as low.

Please note that my question applies only to body size estimates derived from linear measurements. The choice might be different for other applications of linear regression.

Kilmer, J.T. and Rodríguez, R.L. (2017), Ordinary least squares regression is indicated for studies of allometry. J. Evol. Biol., 30: 4-12. doi:10.1111/jeb.12986

More Jorge W. Moreno-Bernal's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions