*Why journals do not pay the reviewers and editors?
*What suggestion do you have regarding the value of payment incentives to these core stakeholders in timely managing and enhancing the accountability and the quality of published works?
See these previous discussions:
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why-the-article-reviewing-peer-review-in-Journal-and-Conference-is-a-voluntary-work/1
https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_many_researchers_think_publishers_journals_should_pay_for_their_content_and_also_for_peer_review/1
https://www.researchgate.net/post/If_there_is_ever_going_to_be_a_time_peer_reviewers_will_be_paid_for_their_services_the_time_is_now/1
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Should_journals_pay_for_peer_review_work/1
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_open-access_journals_reviewers_do_not_get_paid_for_their_job/1
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_dont_journals_pay_reviewers_and_still_sell_publications/1
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_dont_journals_pay_to_reviewers_as_they_bleed_authors_for_publication_fees/1
The following discussions have also some relation to your question:
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Reviewers_participation_should_be_considered_too/1
https://www.researchgate.net/post/What-are-the-benefits-of-being-a-reviewer-for-a-journal/1
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Rewarding_the_work_of_the_referees/1
Hello, again, Getu Habte
I just posted about peer reviews in some other forums and I think this article that I will send the link for is a very good discussion of the situation.
Article Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques,...
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Books