Using Interferrometer to detect subtle things as Ether or Gravitational Waves is a wrong approach. It assume the plane and polarization to be correct. Then it assumes the waves to be simple 1D or 2D, when they can be more complex in 3D. It assumes Frequency which only Man can measure.
For 100 plus years, they taught us Michelson Morely Experiment, which has been proven to be wrong, by Casimir and Dynamic Casimir Effects, and Lamb Shifts,
It was fool hardy to make a mechanistic contraption to measure something as subtle as Ether and assume it to be a one dimensional drift based on Earth going over one dimensional rotation, and discarding other motions as well assuming Ether to be like Wind.
Einstein also thought we could not detect the GW.
My question on LIGO:
0. Why no one explains the real reason for Gravity, beyond Mass? Einstein said the same thing as Newton using Tensor Calculus. One can give mass an infinitely small mass to photon to ignore and under infinite Mass, when passing over it, it would take a "drop" or "dip".
1. How did they assume to build 2M long Inteferrometer?
2. How did they assume the plane of the earth was the correct one?
3. How did they isolate all the movements of earth, jitter in earth's orbits because of moon, sun, galaxy, black hole and its surroundings.
4. Was the mirror polished to the extent that it was 1/1000 x 100 proton width smoother?
5. Was the pendulum so strong, that it would not move even 1/1000 x 1/00 proton width?
6. How did they think the signature of the waves was sent from 2 colliding black holes? You mean it was a theoretical match? Why that wave could not have been sent by some Dark Energy or Dark Matter colliding, parting and so on? Exact match would hapenned if they would have witnessed the colliding signature at t=0.
7. Why are they assuming simplistic two plane vibration, where one plane is stretching and the other plane is compressing? Where does this model come from? I have understood GR Tensor Equation, but no where seen a solution so far. One of things to do.. But in my view the real reason for Gravity would speak out loud that there are complex 3D waves beyond human detection.
8. If they cannot measure Dark Matter and Dark Energy and almost not detect Neutrinos, how they can be sure that some extra passing Neutrinos or something else caused the chirp?
9. When two black bodies, 10x larger than our Sun, collide, the collision is not a blip event. It goes on for sometime. Why they did not see the constant blips of waves or waves of blips over a long period of time. Do not tell me our Sun would collide with another Sun and vanish in a time order of 0.4 secs! To get an idea about Tidal of Energies involved, just a simple Solar Flare goes on for days. Guys were are talking about 2 10 Suns colliding and we only get a
10. Did they track Earth's Magnetic Field and Charge Build at the Laser-Pump Interface. Did they account for Delbrück Scattering, Kerr Effect, Magneto Kerr Effects?
11. This is worse than MM Experiment, where they were at least shifting the legs in different direction. Here they assume the Wave to be in orthogonal plane and polarized parallel to Limbs of LIGO!
Whilst your question is entirely apposite, i Do not have a problem with 2D waves.
BUt there are far more fundamental unanswered questions.
There are also other theories that suggest this result without the paradoxes of GTR
Einstein did not predict the existence of black holes, in fact he denied their existence in a paper published in 1936, Simply because that would imply the existence of singularities, with infinite density and zero time passage at the event horizon.
The force of gravity in General relativity (GTR) is thought to come form the curvature of space-time.
Unfortunately the maths of GTR implies infinite curvature and zero time passage at the black hole event horizon and the black hole becomes a singularity- and yet the black hole has a radius.
The Misner Wheeler Thorne interpretation partially resolved this in that the singularity rests inside the event horizon.
But yet another paradox arises if time stops at the event horizon (frozen star) no matter would fall in hence black hole could not accumulate matter, and all the in-falling matter would be situated at or near the event horizon.
The solution is to alter the maths of GR.
Additionally GR falls down in a number of areas, so any new maths should also resolve these problems
Yes GR works in the weak fields of the the solar system, and Intermediate
fields of neutron stars.
1). It produces infinite density singularities in the very strong fields
such as in black holes.
2).It does not necessarily explain dark matter in galaxy cores where we
know super-massive black holes exist and the galactic dark matter
therein,
3). It does not explain dark mater present in galactic halo's,and galactic
clusters such as the bullet cluster,
4).It does not explain the presence of cosmological dark matter as a whole.
5). It has not yet been fully corroborated by the studies of neutron stars
and in black holes.
6). It does not easily explain the presence of dark energy and cannot be
translated in quantum gravity.
7). It predicts that time stops at the event horizon
Here I enclose a number of publications which explain all of these
phenomena, whilst agreeing with the results of GR where it has been
thoroughly tested.
1).First to obviate the infinite density singularities.
1a)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32897680_An_advanced_dynamic_adaptation_of_Newtonian_equations_of_gravity?ev=prf_pub
1b)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269689554_The_formulation_of_Dynamic_Newtonian_advanced_gravity_DNAg?ev=prf_pub
2).Secondly we explain the presence of dark matter at the centre of the
galaxy.
2a)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228858219_Advances_in_Black_Hole_Gravitational_Physics_and_Cold_Dark_Matter_Modelling._The_Gravity_of_Dark_Matter
3) Thirdly it is possible to explain the presence of dark matter in the
galactic halo.
3a)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269689929_Advances_in_Black_Hole_Physics_and_Dark_Matter_Modelling_of_the_Galactic_Halo?ev=prf_pub
4). It is able to explain the presence of cosmological dark matter
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32897680_An_advanced_dynamic_adaptation_of_Newtonian_equations_of_gravity
5). It is corroborated in neutron stars (including Data from radiation
damping ) and is corroborated by black hole studies.
5a)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32888463_An_advanced_modification_of_dynamicgravitation
5b).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269667939_Corroboration_of_Dynamic_Black_Hole_Gravitational_Physics_from_Observations_of_Cygnus_X-1
6) it explains dark energy and translates into quantum gravity
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32899306_String_quintessence_and_the_formulation_of_advanced_quantum_gravity
7). It does not offer infinite time dilation at the event horizon
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287213872_Finite_Gravitational_Time_Dilation_In_Black_Holes_Using_Dynamic_Newtonian_Advanced_Gravity_DNAg
Read full-text
Article An advanced dynamic adaptation of Newtonian equations of gravity
Article The formulation of Dynamic Newtonian advanced gravity, DNAg
Article Advances in Black Hole Gravitational Physics and Cold Dark M...
Article Advances in Black Hole Physics and Dark Matter Modelling of ...
Article An advanced modification of dynamic gravitation
Article Corroboration of Dynamic Black Hole Gravitational Physics fr...
Article String quintessence and the formulation of advanced quantum gravity
Article Finite Gravitational Time Dilation In Black Holes Using Dyna...
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics
- Applied Mathematics