Quantum Programming Theory and Quantum Consciousness Theory
According to this theory, from the primordial particles of the universe, the entire universe, including life, was created through the cosmic programming code language.
According to this theory, there is a primordial conscious being behind the creation of this universe. That is the creator of this universe. The universe is actually a vast brain-like entity with a supremely conscious mind.
Consciousness pervades the entire universe, from the smallest particle in the universe. Even a piece of stone has consciousness. We are not able to communicate with that piece of stone because its level of consciousness and frequency of consciousness do not match our level of consciousness and frequency of consciousness.
To learn about this new quantum theory in detail you should read my Theory of Creation. However, from the English article, the article written in Bengali language is described in more detail.
Unravelling the mysteries of the amazing space and the creation of the universe!
Space, interior space, greater space, and absolute space (zero).
The Secret Biography of the Universe. From the Beginning to the End of The Creation!
The background of the creation of the universe and all the mysteries from the beginning to the end of the creation of the universe are revealed here one by one. Cosmology and Creationism have become one In this scientific theory!
http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13231.51361
The "Quantum Programming Theory" and "Quantum Consciousness Theory" presented in this discussion thread are intriguing but highly speculative in nature. Here is a critical review of these theories:
1. Lack of Empirical Evidence: One of the most significant shortcomings of these theories is the absence of empirical evidence to support the claims. While theories in science are typically built upon observations, experimentation, and empirical data, these theories seem to rely more on abstract ideas without concrete evidence to substantiate their assertions.
2. Unconventional Claims: The assertion that the entire universe, including life, was created through a "cosmic programming code language" is highly unconventional and not grounded in established scientific principles. The idea of a "primordial conscious being" behind the creation of the universe is reminiscent of religious and philosophical beliefs but lacks empirical support.
3. Undefined Terminology: The theories use terms like "cosmic programming code language" and "primordial conscious being" without clearly defining what these terms mean or how they operate within the context of quantum physics or cosmology. This lack of precise definitions makes it challenging to assess the validity of the theories.
4. Consciousness Claims: The assertion that consciousness pervades the entire universe, even down to the level of inanimate objects like stones, is a controversial claim. While there are ongoing debates about the nature of consciousness in the context of quantum physics, these debates are far from settled, and the idea that stones possess consciousness is not supported by scientific evidence.
5. Lack of Peer Review: Scientific theories typically undergo rigorous peer review by experts in the field to assess their validity and reliability. These theories appear to be presented in an informal online discussion without undergoing such scrutiny.
6. Integration of Cosmology and Creationism: The statement that "Cosmology and Creationism have become one in this scientific theory" raises concerns about the conflation of scientific and religious concepts. Scientific theories are typically secular and based on naturalistic explanations, while creationism is often rooted in religious beliefs.
while these theories may stimulate philosophical and speculative discussions, they lack the scientific rigor and empirical evidence required to be considered valid scientific theories. It's essential to approach such ideas with skepticism and recognize that they exist outside the mainstream scientific consensus. For a theory to be widely accepted in the scientific community, it must be subjected to rigorous testing, peer review, and validation through empirical evidence.
Thank you very much for your critical and thoughtful feedback. This article of mine is actually philosophy of science. It has been tested in imagination which is called thought experiment.
Photons also have consciousness, demonstrating different behavior of photons in the laboratory before the conscious eye of the experimenter and at other times. In order to understand the cosmic-mind and its consciousness, one has to dive deep into the mind in the way of logic. Physical science is unable to reach it.
Religious thoughts have no place in my articles. There are theories and hypotheses of possible realities.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematical Sciences
- Statistics
- Statistical Software
- SPSS