Plagiarism is awful, but how to prevent it specially if you know\think in some way or another (e.g. the students capabilities not that much) that others\some offices did the work\thesis\dissertation instead of the students themselves?
As an editor of many journals and also as general chairs of many international conferences, I come across instances of plagiarism quite often! I talked to many people also about plagiarism - so I am writing some views based on my experience.
Bring an awareness that plagiarism is a criminal and punishable offense. Perhaps, several years ago, some people may have thought internet resources are free, and we may quote them (without credit) or just copy-and-paste material from the internet for the term papers, projects, conference papers or even journal papers. Constantly, efforts are being taken in all countries about Intelligent Property Rights (IPR), and often times, we see news articles about some senior people who got caught for acts of "plagiarism" etc. Strict actions are required to be taken to curb this offense from the beginning. Plagiarism is ethically and legally wrong and it is a punishable, criminal offense. People must be told this in clear terms.
In reviewing, use similarity-check software. Google-search of a few sentences cut-and-paste from the papers will not give desired results. People are clever also in beginning papers in their own sentences, and later on starting the cut-paste technique from published papers, technical data, methodologies, plots, and even references to complete the paper. If you read conclusion, which is in their own words, it may not match with the content of the paper. These are some indicators. The use of professional similarity-check software like Turn-It-In are very useful in detecting plagiairsm in the papers. These software check the full content of the papers, detect similarity from the web-resources and tell us the similarity % also.
Advise students, research scholars and young faculty to understand the subject throughly before they venture to write some term papers / mini - projects (students) or some survey papers (PhD students / young faculty). They need to understand the content of the papers they are surveying or reviewing, and rewrite the summary in their words. Of course, they have to retain the mathematical equations, important formulas etc. Here the key is giving credit to the authors they are surveying. They have to include the papers they are surveying in References and give due credit. Also, in conference papers, authors are expected to do some simulation on their own in comparing the papers they are surveying, discuss simulation results and give conclusions.
Avoid duplication of survey papers when there are so many survey papers in the literature. In conferences, I see some survey papers of some recent topics, when there are already many survey papers. When we read such papers, it may appear that these are good survey papers as authors have credited the source papers in references etc. When we run Turn-It-In software, we may see that many of these papers are plagiarised survey papers, and authors have not credited the original authors who wrote these survey papers (including simulation results and discussion).
Finally, public must be brought aware of copyrights or intellectual property rights. Duplicating / plagiarizing published works without credit and prior permission are gross violations of copyrights.
I truly believe most cases are unintentional. Therefore, the best way to prevent plagiarism is to teach proper methods of citation of sources prior to the writing assignments. In my experience, students don't know what plagiarism is until they are taught what it is. For example, students copy form the Internet so routinely that many of them feel that what is on the Internet is free to copy and use without crediting the source.
In the U.S. there are respected senators and representatives who have been caught plagiarizing others' works (mostly from Wikipedia) and they seem unaware that they have done anything wrong.
The university is the written word. Nevertheless, the university has done a poor job of teaching students how to avoid plagiarism, thus avoiding the resulting public shame.
Good response Reginald. Many universities have plagiarism policy in place and routinely use anti-plagiarism software i.e. Turnitin to try and 'police' assignments. However, the policy is usually quite 'grey'. It's difficult to prove if a student has intentionally plagiarised or it was a 'mistake' - unless they have done it more than once and have been counselled about it previously. Students widely know this and, honest ignorance aside, may well feel tempted to 'test the system'.
As an editor of many journals and also as general chairs of many international conferences, I come across instances of plagiarism quite often! I talked to many people also about plagiarism - so I am writing some views based on my experience.
Bring an awareness that plagiarism is a criminal and punishable offense. Perhaps, several years ago, some people may have thought internet resources are free, and we may quote them (without credit) or just copy-and-paste material from the internet for the term papers, projects, conference papers or even journal papers. Constantly, efforts are being taken in all countries about Intelligent Property Rights (IPR), and often times, we see news articles about some senior people who got caught for acts of "plagiarism" etc. Strict actions are required to be taken to curb this offense from the beginning. Plagiarism is ethically and legally wrong and it is a punishable, criminal offense. People must be told this in clear terms.
In reviewing, use similarity-check software. Google-search of a few sentences cut-and-paste from the papers will not give desired results. People are clever also in beginning papers in their own sentences, and later on starting the cut-paste technique from published papers, technical data, methodologies, plots, and even references to complete the paper. If you read conclusion, which is in their own words, it may not match with the content of the paper. These are some indicators. The use of professional similarity-check software like Turn-It-In are very useful in detecting plagiairsm in the papers. These software check the full content of the papers, detect similarity from the web-resources and tell us the similarity % also.
Advise students, research scholars and young faculty to understand the subject throughly before they venture to write some term papers / mini - projects (students) or some survey papers (PhD students / young faculty). They need to understand the content of the papers they are surveying or reviewing, and rewrite the summary in their words. Of course, they have to retain the mathematical equations, important formulas etc. Here the key is giving credit to the authors they are surveying. They have to include the papers they are surveying in References and give due credit. Also, in conference papers, authors are expected to do some simulation on their own in comparing the papers they are surveying, discuss simulation results and give conclusions.
Avoid duplication of survey papers when there are so many survey papers in the literature. In conferences, I see some survey papers of some recent topics, when there are already many survey papers. When we read such papers, it may appear that these are good survey papers as authors have credited the source papers in references etc. When we run Turn-It-In software, we may see that many of these papers are plagiarised survey papers, and authors have not credited the original authors who wrote these survey papers (including simulation results and discussion).
Finally, public must be brought aware of copyrights or intellectual property rights. Duplicating / plagiarizing published works without credit and prior permission are gross violations of copyrights.
It's people like me, and school teachers, who need to work hard. You are saying that we 'know\think in some way or another (e.g. the students capabilities not that much) that others\some offices did the work\thesis\dissertation instead of the students themselves' . But teachers need to train our students to increase their abilities and NOT to copy. This won't happen automatically.
I taught in school for many years. For science practicals students work in groups. But they must pass up a separate report, they must not copy from each other. They must be graded individually, not as a group. Otherwise, they develop the habit of copying, and it does not seem as awful as we know it is.
First teachers and researchers and then students be sensitised and make aware about the ill effects of plagiarism. There are softwares that check the plagiarism by identifying duplicating or writing matter without reference. Institutions/Universities must subscribe softwares to help students and teachers.
Preventing plagiarism among college students is not difficult. Few suggestions are : Firstly get to know the students by name & by their performance in courses. Secondly, tell them that the project ( case study, literature survey, research...etc.) ought not be done with "copy & paste" and that their own ideas & phrasing must be presented. Thirdly, the reward & punishment policies ought to be explained to the students. Fourthly, direct talk or oral test or some seminar has to be implemented.
If after all, the above (second , fourth) does not work, then I give the student 1 or 2 out of 10 "failure" just because the university's zero is above the known zero in maths. I did this last semester.
Plagiarism is generally being followed mainly due to unawareness of students/scholars, new writers and in hurried occasions following all short-cuts.
So make aware your students and young colleagues especially who have started writing with only few papers. Get these involved with a senior and be taught ways to avoid this, for this papers must be monitored at each level of drafting and compilation -- 1. To first understand the topic and then write / compile in own language (even 2 lines must not be copied as such from any paper / abstract. 2. Expert editing by seniors with due care to change some language further here and there.
Then before submitting get the paper checked via some plagiarism checker software available free or it just takes 50 USD and one can receive full similarity index report. If plagiarism exceeds 15% then ----- follow 2 golden rules as 1. Condense those para / lines to minimum along with rephrasing of sentences in your own words. 2 Again some updation must be done with team leader with experience or following fully one's own language. This way plagiarism will be diluted and removed.
Papers compiled by experts and experienced researchers/scientists themselves fully or in a team mode likewise never meet any plagiarism issue.
Dear Dr. Raed, I am not in Jordan but news came to me, few years ago, that someone in your university (Obviously, I cannot reveal his name) was sacked due to plagiarism. Of course, it was not publicized at that time & it is understandable why. Now, this case is almost forgotten. To me, this proved that your university is a great one.
Our colleagues from Iran did a fine paper on this issue: Academic Dishonesty at Universities: The Case of Plagiarism Among Iranian Language Students. It is also available via second link!
There are many software that can detect plagiarism, or in fact, similarities, such as iThenticate. What is the percentage of similarities that is acceptable for similarities? Is it 20% or 30% or what.
I don't know iThenticate - but it sounds similar to Turnitin (probably the most-used international software) - and it is around 25% that the 'warning' comes up. That doesn't mean to say that it is a problem though. That 25% may represent lots of low (1%-2%) matches. It may also represent direct quotation and/or the bibliography (reference) list - which you can turn off. For me, the problem more arises if you have more than 10-15% match from a single source.
More and more literature availability online may lead to increase in plagiarism after years, since many lines may match written by different authors -- I mean there can be a point of saturation
Dear Dean Whitehead - I agree with you about Turn-It-In similarity report.
The real problem comes when we have over 10-15% match with a single source, and then we have to check content (from the source paper) where the match is occurring. Turn-It-In also indicates its output in terms of colour - green, orange, and red etc. Good journals reject papers with over 30% similarity overall.
Regarding Kupdeep Dhama's comment, yes - as more and more online research content increases, it will be a big challenge for authors to write in a language as some lines may match. "Hence, the system is asymptotically stable". "Hence, the system is unstable." [These sentences may overlap for instance in examples of a paper involving control systems or dynamical systems]. The editors need to study the outputs of the Turn-It-In and make value judgements.
In cricket, we have "on-field" umpires who make the call, and they also use "DRS" technology (computer help) to make decisions. Likewise, whatever software we may use, finally the editors make the call & take the publishing decision.
Both iThenticate and Turnitin are similar. I believe that the problem arises if you have a red color on the whole report or you have more than 5% match from a single source.
In the analysis of plagiarised doctorate of Mayor of Belgrade, "... anyone who can read can check and verify the astounding amount of copying contained in this “doctoral thesis” by using the interactive graph that accompanies this article, together with the relevant plagiarism reports generated by the program iThenticate."!
More on this You have under my thread on plagiarism, page 19!
Plagiarism of paper can be tested here: https://smallseo.tools/plagiarism-checker
What this piece of tools does is that it breaks the contents in smaller sentences and searches sentence by sentence on Google. As google have a very large database and have indexed billions of websites, the chances of finding plagiarised content is good. In this way plagiarised content can be avoided.