It's must be exhausted. The revision process for the writing and figures was brutal. The reviewers requsted to expand the scope of the study dramatically and then add more writing. At the end, the editors asked to cut the writing in half. Plus merge a lot figures together. Nightmare...
Having said that, I am very grateful to the reviewers. As are you. I know many people will complain about receiving long and detailed reviews (which are within the scope of the paper), but I love receiving them. Revising and responding to comments can be time-consuming, but it does make the paper better in the end, and I always learn a lot in the process and make sure to keep these experiences in mind when writing other papers. It is great to see that the reviewers take peer review seriously and sincerely offer suggestions to make the paper the best it can be, and I am very grateful for that.