Hi guys, I am currently analysing my interview data conducted for my dissertation. I am obviously a novice researcher so would appreciate some advice.
I have four interviews conducted and one is sticking out like a sore thumb. Its shorter and less detailed. The participant did not disclose rich experiential data that I can analyse like I have done with the other three. I am doing IPA so need to find themes between participants, and this participant spoke generally about the experience, not about her personal experience.
I know I am at fault here as I should have realised this in the interview and asked her better questions, but it was my first interview.
Can I remove her data? Or do I carry on? I am not sure how to go about analysis when her data is so bland compared to my other three and it just doesn't answer my research question well.
Many thanks, Ruby
For IPA, you definitely need a rich and detailed account, so I would recommend deleting that participant because they do not meet the requirements for your method.
Hi Ruby,
It's not uncommon to encounter variations in the quality and quantity of data collected in research, especially when conducting interviews. It's good that you have recognized this and are seeking advice on how to proceed.
In terms of what to do with the data from the participant who provided less rich data, there are a few options to consider:
Overall, it's important to make a decision that aligns with your research question and the overall goals of your study. It's also important to acknowledge any limitations or variations in your data collection and analysis in your final report.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Medical Science Nursing
- Dissertations