Hi,

I'm attempting to clone a gene into a shuttle vector that doesn't have any standard features for protein expression.

I designed primers to capture my gene (~1500bp). The forward primer has a 5' ribosome-binding site, and the reverse primer includes a 6His-tag so I can purify the protein. Both primers include conventional restriction sites for directional, ligation-based cloning. My first attempt worked great and I got a 1500bp product that ligated into the vector and sequenced correctly. I found the 6His-tag was detectable by Western blot but wasn't binding to Ni-NTA. This is a large membrane protein and it isn't unusual to see this, so I reordered the reverse primer, but this time it encodes a 10His tag.

Now, when I run PCR, I get a very faint band at ~1500bp and a very bright major product at ~750bp. I have boosted the stringency and ramped the annealing temperature up as high as I can, but the major product is always the 750bp size and I get little to none of the ~1500bp expected product. I have even used my linear product from the first primer set as a template and I still get this 750bp amplicon. There are no internal binding sites for the primer, I have BLAST searched my primer in case it's picking up contaminating E. coli genomic DNA, but nothing. When I switch back to the 6His primer set, the ~1500bp product is reproducible, even using the same template. The only difference between these PCRs is the expansion of a 6-His (GTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTG) to a 10-His (GTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTG) at the 5' end of the reverse primer. The 3' priming region and the 5' enzyme cut sites of both reverse primers are the same, and I use the same forward primer in both PCR reactions.

Has anyone seen this before? I wonder if the product is in fact the correct 1500bp size but is somehow forming secondary structures and running at a lower apparent size - maybe the additional tandem repeats at the 5' end of the reverse primer are causing this? This is a 1% TAE gel run about 20 mins at 120V. I'm attempting to digest and ligate this to see if it will clone, but in the meantime I'd appreciate any help interpreting this.

Thanks!

ACA

More Alexander C. Anderson's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions