Here are a series of interrelated questions that are hard to separate, therefore I am inviting you to comment, share your point of view.
I should add to the above question(s):
Do humans respect Life? We search for Origins of Life, but do we know ourselves enough? Once we will (if we will) elucidate what Life is all about and its origin(s) will we respect each other more? Will it make any difference as far as our natural resources are managed here on Earth? Will humanity continue dominating nature towards resources' exhaustion? Will we continue with such behavior outer-space, on other planets if we are to eventually populate them? Are we somehow superior beings? Are anywhere in the Universe other possible forms of Life, (intelligent, more or less) ?
For now, my definition of Life:
“Life is just a mater of transmutations and a continuous process of potential satisfaction, bounding, energy capture, growth, and eventually adaptation, learning and perhaps reproduction. Death is a result of “Life’s spring-like bouncing effect”.
Please do not forget to vote each member’s contributions and endorse their skills as you see it properly fit. ResearchGate community grows with us as colleagues for us as society at large.
Regards,
Dr. Adrian Toader-Williams.
Dear ResearchGate (RG) participating members, following the research I conducted for more then 15 years, I arrived to some (partial) conclusions. In an upcoming paper I will describe, my definition of Life. For now I state:
“Life is just a mater of transmutations and a continuous process of potential satisfaction, bounding, energy capture, growth, and eventually adaptation, learning and perhaps reproduction. Death is a result of “Life’s spring-like bouncing effect”.
With this occasion I would like to apologize for my absence (lack of available time) and also to thank all members that are following my work / posts / contributions here on RG, for their vote on my activity and for their endorsements on my skills; we all grow as scientific community by communicating and sharing thoughts and opinions.
Regards,
Dr. Adrian Toader-Williams.
There can be a series and levels of the journey of human from know to unknown, and here such journey can be supported by some "anti-entropy" i.e life. Now many or sometime uncountable elements can get gather under this umbrella of "life". How far we need to go is defiantly beyond our counts, or at-least beyond today counts. You are very right that its a continuous journey but with continuous limitations as well. All we need to search the back-end design first to make this journey more result orientated and efficient. Sometime it seems that it is war between Human brain and Nature. At commanding levels matters become some complicated and conflicting as well. Anyhow it can be assumed that the purpose of life is different for every one and most of the time its not in hand of human to alter it against the environmental and Natural effects. human to human differences are also the result of such limitations or diversity as well. Its a very good question and need a proper research on it.
Here I share with you a recent paper of my own authorship, where it demonstrates that the probability of life tends to zero than to one.
Intelligent life or any type of life involves processes with nonlinear chaotic
behaviours throughout the Universe. Through the sensitive dependence condition, chaotic dynamics are also difficult or impossible to duplicate, forecast and predict.
The purpose in life is to decide through certain limits; that’s what really underlies on every nonlinear chaotic sequence in nature, the universe, and us. Decide your path or find some limits, then find your purpose. That’s my personal opinion.
Article Evolution through the stochastic dyadic Cantor Set: the uniq...
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Psychology
- Developmental Psychology