On all the research we do, we use our thoughts, brain and the structure of mind to, logically or not, come to findings and conclusions.

Should our own personal system, the intervention of thought in our behaviour and our decisions, not be the priority of all research prior to using it to conclude and project?

How can we keep a clear view on reality when that first instance, that first opportunity of our senses sensing this reality, thought is trying to intervene and bend what is real, raw and unbiased, into our projections?

If you are not in control of your thoughts, this source of all options to the reality in front of you, how can your findings be clear and uncorrupted, free from infection of that same thought process, dictating your emotions snd feelings, dragging you into the realm of these two where escape is close to impossible?

If you are on control of your thought producing system, able to intervene and dismiss the very thoughts you know are leading you into endless persuit of never reaching satisfaction, is than the tranquillity that remains not fully providing what you were looking for and filters all persuit to want to know, how superficial it may be, letting the attention economy have all those others who are not in control of their thoughts yet?

Your thoughts (pun intended) and opinions are, as always, very appreciated.

Similar questions and discussions