My expert opinion: There is no threat of explosion of nuclear warheads of submarines.

There is this opinion: "Now the maintenance of submarines, in particular the loading of missiles, will be complicated, but the performance of tasks is unlikely to change."

https://glavred.net/world/problema-imela-mesto-v-vms-ocenili-povrezhdeniya-bazy-atomnyh-submarin-rf-10686653.html?utm_source=ukrnet_news

What do you think?

The draft of the Borei-type submarines is 10 m. The depth at the pier of Rybachy Island is no more than 13 m. The average depth is 7 m. A drop in the level before the arrival of the tsunami by 1.5 m with a subsequent rise in the level by 2-3 m (especially when the time of the tsunami coincides with the tide) in conditions of a current with a speed of 2 m/s, one can assume critical multiple impacts of the submarine hull on the bottom and the pier.

This is an overview of information source https://focus.ua/world/717048-zemletryasenie-na-kamchatke-atomnaya-baza-rf-pod-ugrozoy

The mega-earthquake in Kamchatka raised alarm about the security of the strategic military base of the Russian Federation. Submarines of the Borei, Delta and Yasen classes were under threat.

Despite the assurances of the Russian authorities that the objects were designed to withstand even a nuclear attack, doubts remain. There were assumptions about the presence in the base of the submarine K-329 "Belhorod" - the longest in the world. It is capable of carrying Poseidon nuclear torpedoes. In addition to nuclear submarines, there are ships with cruise missiles - "Yasen-M" and "Oscar" - in Avachy Bay. Their condition remains unknown. Experts warn: even insignificant waves could lead to hulls hitting piers or flooding due to open hatches, especially during maintenance. The current incident showed how vulnerable strategic military facilities are in seismic activity zones.

This is an overview of information source https://focus.ua/world/717019-zemletryasenie-na-kamchatke-prodolzhaetsya-atomnye-podlodki-rf-v-zone-riska-foto-i-video

The OSINT project Frontelligence Insight notes that the submarines could have been damaged.

Several key facilities of the Russian submarine fleet and naval infrastructure are located in Avachy Bay:

the "Rybachy" submarine base, there are submarines of the Pacific Fleet;

a specialized pier for loading ballistic missiles onto submarines.

The extent of the damage to the military infrastructure from the earthquake in Kamchatka is unclear, but some destruction is possible, according to researchers.

https://focus.ua/static/storage/thumbs/1088x/c/ec/43681db2-88ba38db8d3ab1a796c4aa3ab2308ecc.webp - foto 1

https://overclockers.ru/blog/kosmos_news/show/235139/Eksperty-otricajut-povrezhdenie-atomnyh-podvodnyh-lodok-na-Kamchatke-posle-zemletryaseniya photo 2

The satellite images that appeared on the Internet show that after the tsunami, two Yasen project 885 submarines remained moored at the piers. According to experts, nothing indicates that the ships are damaged, and the piers used by nuclear submarines are designed to withstand seismic effects.

https://www.vkpress.ru/life/udar-po-yadernomu-shchitu-strategicheskaya-baza-na-kamchatke-postradala-posle-tsunami/?id=191457

The tsunami damaged the strategic base of nuclear submarines in Kamchatka, reports the British The Telegraph

According to the British publication The Telegraph, a devastating tsunami reached the naval base "Rybachy" in the city of Vylyuchynsk, located in Krasheninnikova Bay. This base is considered one of the key stations for Russian strategic nuclear submarines.

Satellite images recorded damage to the pier infrastructure: part of the pier was displaced and probably separated from the shore as a result of the impact of a powerful wave.

▪️The natural disaster hit the coast approximately 15 minutes after the 8.8 magnitude earthquake.

https://charter97.org/ru/news/2025/8/1/650428/

The Russian Navy can review the construction standards of the apparently damaged pier. While the other nine piers at the base are built entirely of concrete, the long upper part of the damaged one appears to be a floating superstructure.

The Russian Navy can review the construction standards of the apparently damaged pier. While the other nine piers at the base are built entirely of concrete, the long upper part of the damaged one appears to be a floating superstructure.

https://meduza.io/feature/2025/08/01/na-kamchatke-est-baza-podvodnyh-lodok-opublikovany-foto-chto-tam-sluchilos-posle-zemletryaseniya

photo 3,4

Now the facts. I have attached minute-by-minute measurements of the level in Avacha Bay, where the submarines are located. The arrow shows the time of the tsunami arrival. There are displacements of the piers, but there was no change in the level in the bay - water. Source of information: https://www.ioc-sealevelmonitoring.org/station.php?code=petr

Now the facts. I have attached the sea level measurements in the epicenter area. The tsunami height is close to the wave height of the 2011 Fukushima earthquake.

Source of information: https://www.ioc-sealevelmonitoring.org/station.php?code=dkam2

I think that the cause of destruction is reciprocating currents and seiche oscillations, when in seiche nodes the speed of horizontal displacements reaches several meters per second.

Maybe I'm wrong?

My colleagues have prepared an article with the following title: "Assessment of the vulnerability of strategic facilities in closed bays to artificially generated tsunami waves by means such as the nuclear torpedo "Poseidon"".

The question arises, is there any interest in this publication? I am attaching an abstract of the article.

"The vulnerability of strategic facilities in closed bays to artificially generated tsunami waves by means of the Poseidon nuclear torpedo type has been assessed. The results of the study are relevant for the US Navy Naval Base San Diego, Naval Base Kitsap located in the bays, and for the infrastructure of the San Francisco Bay. The vulnerability assessment was performed based on experimental data from measuring the tsunamigenic characteristics of the earthquake of 07/29/2025 M=8.8, using the example of Avacha Bay (Pacific Ocean), where up to 50% of Russia's strategic submarines are permanently based.

Based on objective satellite reconnaissance data, the features of the destruction of the Russian Navy's submarine infrastructure were established, and hypotheses were put forward as to the causes of the destruction that occurred. These hypotheses were confirmed by appropriate calculations.

It was found that the TTX weapons of the Poseidon nuclear torpedo are fundamentally incapable of providing the formation of a tsunami wave, even 20 cm high. It was found that in closed bays and on coasts with a steep coastal slope, tsunami waves do not pose any threat. It was found that strategic facilities of NATO countries deployed in the Atlantic Ocean, despite the level of seismic activity, do not fall into the zone of vulnerability to tsunami waves. "

Yesterday at the parade the President of the People's Republic of China began to scare the President of the United States with nuclear torpedoes that generate destructive tsunamis. Photo attached, source of information https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXnV8iptmYo (video time 32:00). We now understand that this nuclear underwater weapon, for which there really are "no detection systems or destruction systems" - performed by "Poseidon" - is a psychological weapon. The explosion of "Poseidon" will not have any dangerous consequences.

The People's Republic of China stole a non-working weapon from Russia - "Dummy". China spent a lot of yuan and now looks ridiculous. Wanted to look threatening, but did not study the theory of the origin of tsunami waves. The theory of tsunami is presented in my publications.

Opposition Russian пeneral Ivashov stated that the nuclear torpedo of the PRC, an analogue of the Russian nuclear torpedo "Poseidon", is the main deterrent factor in the confrontation between the United States and the China-Russia bloc (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgJH2Z_hf5Y).

The statement of the opposition politician indicates the stability of the existence of the myth about the possibility of inciting a tsunami by a nuclear explosion.

As a certified specialist, I am now debunking the myth of the possibility of generating a tsunami by a nuclear explosion at a scientific level.

Firstly, no underwater test of a nuclear bomb has ever caused a tsunami. For example, the Baker test on the Bikini Atoll (July 25, 1946) had a capacity of 21 kilotons and did not cause a tsunami.

Russian and Chinese propagandists are scaring US President Trump with the capacity of the Poseidon of 2 megatons. Donald, do not be afraid. You and the civilian population of the US are being fooled, as always.

I will give the consequences of a 10 megaton explosion (link https://www.ixbt.com/live/science/nevidimye-posledstviya-samogo-moschnogo-izverzheniya-xxi-veka-vulkan-hunga-tonga-nakryl-okean-pepelnym-savanom.html). The photo that I attached is published at this link.

This is a powerful explosion of the Hunga-Tonga-Hunga-Haapai volcano in the Pacific Ocean on January 15, 2022 (https://hromadske.ua/posts/u-tihomu-okeani-stalosya-viverzhennya-pidvodnogo-vulkana-pislya-cogo-hvili-cunami-nakrili-ostrivnu-derzhavu). The photo that I attached is published at this link.

It is important to assess the consequences of the explosion.

As a result of the "spray dome" at the site of the explosion, 4 people died, but a "spray dome" is not a tsunami wave.

The height of the tsunami, for example, in Japan was 1 m, compared to the ocean tide (height 2.5 m), which occurs in Japan daily.

Conclusion. As a result of the simultaneous detonation of five nuclear torpedoes of the Russian or Chinese "Poseidon" type, the height of the tsunami will not exceed the height of the daily tide.

I ask the experts to join the discussion, because in essence the topic of the discussion is the threat to the world from geophysical weapons, which confuses everyone, and only I am officially participating in the discussion.