I understand non-associative learning is learning from a single stimulus. Many sources I can find show that habituation and sensitisation are forms of non-associative learning. Examples of single stimulus habituation are simple to imagine, but single stimulus sensitisation not so much. Many of the examples of sensitisation that people mention are actually examples of associative learning. I think the problem stems from the terminology, which suggests the following:

Desensitisation = opposite of sensitisation.

Habituation = opposite of sensitisation.

Therefore, habituation = desensitsation

I do not think that habituation is the same as desensitisation, but the terminology seems to be saying this is the case. I thought habituation was single stimulus learning, but desensitisation was the unlearning of a classically conditioned response (and therefore a type of associative learning).

Can anyone shed any light on this for me?

More Dennis Wormald's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions