Preprint Evidence of Dark Numbers

No proof at 10.3, Wolfgang!

You did two relations. The first is `counting the first column´.

This takes place by:

IN –> IN (of the matrix)

So from the naturals to a subset of the matrix.

Every relation for sets have to be between two different sets.

So the first you took is correct.

The second takes place by:

IN (of the matrix) –> all of the matrix

This isn’t a correct relation. You also point (backwards) on the elements of the identical set, the subset `IN (of the matrix)´.

But you have to take an independent set IN if you want to count any other set, even if it is the same way constructed as the counter is.

This is your cardinal-mistake. I will only point on this.

Any discussion about?