Hi everybody.
I'm currently writing a manuscript and there are discrepancies between authors on the use of "marl" and "clay", some of them suggesting that these are outdated terms that should be avoided in favor of "marlstone" and "claystone". I have found some opinion pieces on the internet supporting this view, but I'm not sure if there is scientific consensus on the matter.
To be clear, I use the terms "marl" and "clay" when referring to unconsolidated (but not recent!) sediment. The use of "-stone" in this context seems counterintuitive to me.
What do you think?