Dear Markus, to make sense of democratic data during chaos you need a different type of democracy model than the traditional one to explain how within a democratic contest there can be an extreme democratic outcome where the view of the minority; and therefore, the best interest of the minority supersedes the common good.
Before 2016 I saw the chaotic wave affecting the UK and saw the BREXIT movement coming and I realized that the traditional democracy model does not fit the dynamics of an extreme democratic outcome like BREXIT, and I started thinking about how the structure of a liberal democracy would be affected by the coming of what appears to be impossible, an extreme democratic outcome. This became reality; and once a reality then the need to understand what environment does it needs to persist and if possible spread/expand or what could bring it down and back to a normal democratic outcome became important….
I wrote a paper to link voting complacency and normal democratic outcome and extreme democratic outcomes, then I wrote a paper providing the conditions needed to predict specific type of democratic outcomes, after I wrote a paper showing that the nature of an extreme democratic outcome can be extracted simply by flipping the nature of a normal democratic outcome, and finally I linked all the above to targeted chaos to create the conditions of extreme democratic outcomes….
I am sharing the last paper below:
Moral and Amoral Liberal Democracies: How Targeted Chaos Can Affect the Democratic Process?
As there were no clear examples in practice about extreme democratic outcomes like BREXIT, USEXIT, BRAZILEXIT…. before 2016 I waited until after 2016 BREXIT and 2016 USEXIT to start publishing my ideas explaining them as even the opposition parties who lost those elections and the general true majority could not understand what had happened as the unexpected happened….
Now that there were examples that match the extreme liberal democracy model I was advancing, I wrote about what to expect locally and globally, from extreme democratic outcome movements/leaders using USEXT/Trumpism as the general model, which is shared below:
The 2016 shift from normal liberal democracy to extreme liberal democracy in the USA: Pointing out the structure of Trumpconomics, its meaning, and its expected local and global implications, both analytically and graphically
In general. complacency theory suggest that if there is no chaos aimed at the true majority view as targeted chaos is reined in by the rule of law or the true majority has learned the past lesson that voting in ways that will later comeback to bite you is not a good way to protest or advance the common good…. For example, if chaos is rained in the USA, we will see a normal democratic outcome in the USA….. If chaos is rained in all countries that fell under exism mode since 2016, we will see them returning to a normal democratic outcome position…
I wish my comment and the material shared is useful to what you are working on.
Namibian authorities stop using electronic voting during the Covid-19 pandemic. In the US, many voters voted early in 2020. Internet voting was actively used in the Russian elections in 2020.
Thank you for your comment Markus.... as you know targeted chaos was rained in this time around in the USA, both in the election and in all levels of the court system after election day, and a normal democratic outcome took place in the USA as expected/predicted in the model....