i have treated the both and didn't really noticed any big difference. its just the size of the incision which will make the pt feel more pain. unfortunately, i couldn't find any articles regarding pt management for such case and i do believe sooner or later this case should undergo for research.
Yes, I agree that research is needed to understand the post surgery complications and the most efficient rehabilitation process. I think the main differences between robotic CABG and traditional CABG are the site and the size of the wound. Robotic CABG is minimally invasive with small cuts on the side of the chest while sternotomy is needed for a traditional CABG. Hence, length of stay in hospital may be shortened. Apart from preventing complications such as chest infection, deep vein thrombosis, limitations of upper limbs and trunk movement, cardiac rehabilitation phase I, II, III, IV are important rehabilitation components for those underwent CABG to improve functional capacity and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.
Thanks for your response!! Really needed it, as I couldn’t find much difference other than the points u mentioned! much appreciated!
Yes i also agree that there is gap in research to find out the post surgery pulmonary complication which i think might have a difference in outcomes.